LDEM vs. MSTZ
LDEM (iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. LDEM is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, LDEM returned 14.36% vs 150.38% for MSTZ. Their -0.36 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. LDEM charges 0.16%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
LDEM vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDEM achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -32.77% return.
LDEM
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.64%
- 5Y*
- 2.20%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.02%
MSTZ
- 1D
- -3.35%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- 6M
- -35.30%
- YTD
- -32.77%
- 1Y
- 150.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -86.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $34.08K | $42.01K | $92.23K | |
| $99.07M | $124.74M | $178.48M |
LDEM vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LDEM iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF | 4.06% | 32.49% | -1.50% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -32.77% | -38.95% | -94.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDEM and MSTZ is -0.40, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | -0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDEM vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
LDEM
MSTZ
LDEM vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDEM | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.26 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 1.78 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.95 | 3.30 | -0.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDEM vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDEM drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEM and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDEM | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.82% | -99.38% | +58.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -84.89% | +71.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.49% | -97.71% | +91.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.09% | -94.63% | +77.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 45.77% | -40.88% |
Volatility
LDEM vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) is 6.84%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 33.58%. This indicates that LDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDEM | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 33.58% | -26.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.91% | 134.23% | -117.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 149.52% | -129.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 169.71% | -150.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 169.71% | -148.79% |
LDEM vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDEM has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDEM vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
LDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEM iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF | 2.95% | 3.26% | 2.64% | 3.20% | 4.93% | 1.82% | 1.89% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDEM and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (33.58%) compared to LDEM (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDEM dropped -40.82% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 150.38% vs 14.36% for LDEM. On fees, LDEM is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, LDEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 150.38% return vs 14.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LDEM is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
LDEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
LDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for LDEM and 1.05% for MSTZ.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LDEM and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer