LCUA.DE vs. LGGA.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LCUA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc) and LGGA.DE (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - LCUA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while LGGA.DE tracks the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LCUA.DE returned 22.72%/yr vs 18.10%/yr for LGGA.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCUA.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LGGA.DE.

Performance

LCUA.DE vs. LGGA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCUA.DE achieves a 31.85% return, which is significantly higher than LGGA.DE's 17.67% return.

LCUA.DE

• 1D: -1.97%
• 1M: 7.77%
• YTD: 31.85%
• 6M: 33.69%
• 1Y: 54.70%
• 3Y*: 22.72%
• 5Y*: 8.90%
• 10Y*: —

LGGA.DE

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 17.67%
• 6M: 17.01%
• 1Y: 34.87%
• 3Y*: 18.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCUA.DE vs. LGGA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc	31.85%	18.08%	18.51%	3.26%	-14.89%	-5.87%
LGGA.DE L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF	17.67%	21.16%	9.89%	5.48%	-3.83%	1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LCUA.DE and LGGA.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021	0.70

The correlation between LCUA.DE and LGGA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LCUA.DE vs. LGGA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCUA.DE

LCUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 83
LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
LCUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
LCUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 83
LCUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
LCUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

LGGA.DE

LGGA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 73
LGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
LGGA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
LGGA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 74
LGGA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
LGGA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCUA.DE vs. LGGA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCUA.DE	LGGA.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	2.39	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	3.29	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.43	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.49	3.91	+0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.33	11.16	+5.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCUA.DE vs. LGGA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the LGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCUA.DE and LGGA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCUA.DE	LGGA.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.72	2.39	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.73	-0.25

Drawdowns

LCUA.DE vs. LGGA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.18%, which is greater than LGGA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUA.DE and LGGA.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCUA.DE	LGGA.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.18%	-17.88%	-15.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.13%	-8.87%	-3.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.07%	-17.88%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.86%	-1.58%	-1.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.02%	-4.82%	-7.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	3.12%	+0.22%

Volatility

LCUA.DE vs. LGGA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE) at 4.89%. This indicates that LCUA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGGA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCUA.DE	LGGA.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.54%	4.89%	+3.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.04%	11.17%	+5.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.08%	14.58%	+5.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.48%	13.77%	+4.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.46%	13.77%	+5.69%

LCUA.DE vs. LGGA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCUA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LGGA.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCUA.DE vs. LGGA.DE - Dividend Comparison

LCUA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LGGA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LGGA.DE L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF	3.76%	4.29%	4.70%	5.40%	4.98%	1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCUA.DE and LGGA.DE in my portfolio?

LCUA.DE and LGGA.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LCUA.DE or LGGA.DE?

On fees, LCUA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCUA.DE or LGGA.DE?

LCUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LGGA.DE.

What is the main difference between LCUA.DE and LGGA.DE?

LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while LGGA.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCUA.DE and 0.40% for LGGA.DE.