PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGGA.DE vs. IAPD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LGGA.DE vs. IAPD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LGGA.DE vs. IAPD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LGGA.DE
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF
11.26%21.16%9.89%5.48%-3.83%1.07%
IAPD.L
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS
12.22%16.50%14.80%11.30%5.65%-0.70%
Different Trading Currencies

LGGA.DE is traded in EUR, while IAPD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IAPD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGGA.DE achieves a 11.26% return, which is significantly lower than IAPD.L's 12.27% return.


LGGA.DE

1D
2.41%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
11.26%
6M
14.49%
1Y
35.99%
3Y*
16.08%
5Y*
10Y*

IAPD.L

1D
2.14%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
12.27%
6M
20.30%
1Y
34.83%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
8.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LGGA.DE vs. IAPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGGA.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IAPD.L's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LGGA.DE vs. IAPD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGGA.DE
LGGA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGGA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

IAPD.L
IAPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IAPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGGA.DE vs. IAPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGGA.DEIAPD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

2.47

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.86

3.00

-0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.49

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

3.56

+0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.20

16.33

-4.13

LGGA.DE vs. IAPD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the IAPD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGGA.DE and IAPD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGGA.DEIAPD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.47

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.37

+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between LGGA.DE and IAPD.L is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LGGA.DE vs. IAPD.L - Dividend Comparison

LGGA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than IAPD.L's 4.95% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGGA.DE
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF
3.97%4.29%4.70%5.40%4.98%1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IAPD.L
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS
4.95%5.67%6.72%7.29%8.34%7.53%4.77%7.26%7.70%6.15%5.60%8.10%

Drawdowns

LGGA.DE vs. IAPD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGGA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum IAPD.L drawdown of -63.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGA.DE and IAPD.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LGGA.DEIAPD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-52.66%

+34.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.72%

-11.25%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.60%

-4.09%

-2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-7.41%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.14%

+0.85%

Volatility

LGGA.DE vs. IAPD.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LGGA.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L) at 4.35%. This indicates that LGGA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LGGA.DEIAPD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

4.35%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.78%

8.16%

+2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.02%

14.10%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.61%

13.10%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.61%

16.18%

-2.57%