PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCTD vs. VCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LCTD vs. VCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LCTD vs. VCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
1.14%30.42%3.14%17.10%-16.16%-0.36%
VCLN
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF
9.96%55.75%-6.69%-17.54%-7.87%-5.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTD achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than VCLN's 9.96% return.


LCTD

1D
3.15%
1M
-7.73%
YTD
1.14%
6M
5.65%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
10Y*

VCLN

1D
4.26%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
9.96%
6M
19.57%
1Y
72.36%
3Y*
9.48%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCTD vs. VCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than VCLN's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LCTD vs. VCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTD
LCTD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LCTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTD Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VCLN
VCLN Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
VCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTD vs. VCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCTDVCLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

2.44

-1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

3.16

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.40

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

5.64

-3.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.08

20.86

-12.79

LCTD vs. VCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the VCLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTD and VCLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCTDVCLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.44

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.11

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between LCTD and VCLN is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LCTD vs. VCLN - Dividend Comparison

LCTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than VCLN's 1.83% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
3.57%3.61%3.74%3.16%3.52%2.20%
VCLN
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF
1.83%2.01%1.16%1.14%0.65%0.00%

Drawdowns

LCTD vs. VCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTD drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, smaller than the maximum VCLN drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTD and VCLN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LCTDVCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.82%

-45.66%

+15.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-12.58%

+1.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.95%

-5.48%

-2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-24.93%

+18.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

3.40%

-0.52%

Volatility

LCTD vs. VCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) is 7.53%, while Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that LCTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LCTDVCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

9.99%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

21.33%

-10.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.08%

29.85%

-12.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

27.35%

-11.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

27.35%

-11.33%