LCTD vs. URAN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN).

LCTD and URAN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCTD is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 8, 2021. URAN is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2024.

Performance

LCTD vs. URAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LCTD vs. URAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	2.78%	30.42%	-8.17%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	6.65%	49.05%	4.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTD achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly lower than URAN's 6.65% return.

LCTD

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: -4.78%
• YTD: 2.78%
• 6M: 6.42%
• 1Y: 25.79%
• 3Y*: 14.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

URAN

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: -13.54%
• YTD: 6.65%
• 6M: -0.80%
• 1Y: 72.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCTD vs. URAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than URAN's 0.35% expense ratio.

URAN

Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF

LCTD

BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF

Return for Risk

LCTD vs. URAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTD

LCTD Risk / Return Rank: 79
LCTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
LCTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
LCTD Omega Ratio Rank: 76
LCTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LCTD Martin Ratio Rank: 79

URAN

URAN Risk / Return Rank: 81
URAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
URAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
URAN Omega Ratio Rank: 77
URAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
URAN Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTD vs. URAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCTD	URAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.80	-0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	2.40	-0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.30	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	3.10	-0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.04	7.08	+1.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCTD vs. URAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the URAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTD and URAN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCTD	URAN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.80	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	1.01	-0.56

Correlation

The correlation between LCTD and URAN is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LCTD vs. URAN - Dividend Comparison

LCTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than URAN's 2.40% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	3.51%	3.61%	3.74%	3.16%	3.52%	2.20%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	2.40%	2.56%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LCTD vs. URAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTD drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, smaller than the maximum URAN drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTD and URAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCTD	URAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.82%	-31.96%	+2.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.92%	-23.89%	+12.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.46%	-19.04%	+12.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.91%	-10.00%	+3.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	10.47%	-7.56%

Volatility

LCTD vs. URAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) is 7.20%, while Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) has a volatility of 12.00%. This indicates that LCTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCTD	URAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	12.00%	-4.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.09%	30.74%	-19.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.12%	40.35%	-23.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.03%	39.21%	-23.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.03%	39.21%	-23.18%