PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCTD vs. EVUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LCTD vs. EVUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LCTD vs. EVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
1.14%30.42%3.14%6.85%
EVUS
Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF
-0.24%13.31%14.23%3.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTD achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly higher than EVUS's -0.24% return.


LCTD

1D
3.15%
1M
-7.73%
YTD
1.14%
6M
5.65%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
10Y*

EVUS

1D
2.09%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
2.03%
1Y
10.63%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCTD vs. EVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EVUS's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

LCTD vs. EVUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTD
LCTD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LCTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTD Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

EVUS
EVUS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
EVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTD vs. EVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCTDEVUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

0.70

+0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

1.06

+0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.15

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.00

+1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.08

4.42

+3.66

LCTD vs. EVUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the EVUS Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTD and EVUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCTDEVUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

0.70

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.75

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between LCTD and EVUS is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LCTD vs. EVUS - Dividend Comparison

LCTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than EVUS's 1.72% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
3.57%3.61%3.74%3.16%3.52%2.20%
EVUS
Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF
1.72%1.62%1.99%2.31%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LCTD vs. EVUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTD drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, which is greater than EVUS's maximum drawdown of -15.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTD and EVUS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LCTDEVUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.82%

-15.65%

-14.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-11.79%

+0.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.95%

-5.79%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-2.88%

-4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.67%

+0.21%

Volatility

LCTD vs. EVUS - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS) at 4.25%. This indicates that LCTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LCTDEVUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

4.25%

+3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

8.07%

+2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.08%

15.38%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

12.84%

+3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

12.84%

+3.18%