LCTD vs. CLOA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LCTD (BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) and CLOA (BlackRock AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCTD is a Alternative Energy Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while CLOA is a CLO fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LCTD returned 14.96%/yr vs 6.74%/yr for CLOA. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

LCTD vs. CLOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTD achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than CLOA's 2.06% return.

LCTD

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 6.33%
• 6M: 8.97%
• 1Y: 19.28%
• 3Y*: 14.96%
• 5Y*: 6.77%
• 10Y*: —

CLOA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 5.28%
• 3Y*: 6.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCTD vs. CLOA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	6.33%	30.42%	3.14%	9.83%
CLOA BlackRock AAA CLO ETF	2.06%	5.44%	7.25%	8.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LCTD and CLOA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2023	0.07

Return for Risk

LCTD vs. CLOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTD

LCTD Risk / Return Rank: 37
LCTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
LCTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
LCTD Omega Ratio Rank: 36
LCTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
LCTD Martin Ratio Rank: 40

CLOA

CLOA Risk / Return Rank: 99
CLOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTD vs. CLOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCTD	CLOA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	7.45	-6.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	13.98	-12.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	3.34	-2.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	30.02	-28.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.39	150.47	-144.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCTD vs. CLOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the CLOA Sharpe Ratio of 7.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTD and CLOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCTD	CLOA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	7.45	-6.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	5.22	-4.74

Drawdowns

LCTD vs. CLOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTD drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, which is greater than CLOA's maximum drawdown of -1.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTD and CLOA.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCTD	CLOA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.82%	-1.34%	-28.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.92%	-0.18%	-10.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.59%	-1.13%	-12.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.23%	0.00%	-3.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.79%	-0.05%	-6.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	0.04%	+2.99%

Volatility

LCTD vs. CLOA - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) at 0.15%. This indicates that LCTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCTD	CLOA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	0.15%	+4.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.99%	0.48%	+11.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.55%	0.71%	+13.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.14%	1.32%	+14.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.06%	1.32%	+14.74%

LCTD vs. CLOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LCTD and CLOA have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LCTD vs. CLOA - Dividend Comparison

LCTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than CLOA's 4.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLOA BlackRock AAA CLO ETF	4.96%	5.35%	6.01%	5.88%	0.00%	0.00%
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	3.40%	3.61%	3.74%	3.16%	3.52%	2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCTD and CLOA in my portfolio?

LCTD and CLOA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCTD or CLOA?

LCTD has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to CLOA (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTD dropped -29.82% vs CLOA's -1.34%.

Which ETF is better, LCTD or CLOA?

On 3-year performance, LCTD leads with 14.96% vs 6.74% for CLOA. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, CLOA has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LCTD or CLOA?

Over the 3-year period, LCTD has performed better with a 14.96% return vs 6.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCTD or CLOA?

LCTD and CLOA have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCTD or CLOA?

CLOA has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 3.40% for LCTD.

What is the main difference between LCTD and CLOA?

LCTD is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while CLOA is CLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.45 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.