LCRYX vs. QDVBX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LCRYX (Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund) and QDVBX (Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, LCRYX returned -0.19%/yr vs -0.10%/yr for QDVBX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LCRYX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for QDVBX.

Performance

LCRYX vs. QDVBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund (LCRYX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCRYX achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly higher than QDVBX's -0.23% return.

LCRYX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 0.11%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: 4.45%
• 3Y*: 4.01%
• 5Y*: -0.19%
• 10Y*: 1.54%

QDVBX

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: -0.23%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 3.50%
• 3Y*: 4.24%
• 5Y*: -0.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCRYX vs. QDVBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LCRYX Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund	0.11%	7.36%	1.33%	5.55%	-14.16%	-0.69%	8.21%	0.19%
QDVBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans	-0.23%	7.64%	1.62%	6.37%	-14.31%	-0.37%	6.70%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between LCRYX and QDVBX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2019	0.89

The correlation between LCRYX and QDVBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LCRYX vs. QDVBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCRYX

LCRYX Risk / Return Rank: 20
LCRYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
LCRYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
LCRYX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
LCRYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
LCRYX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

QDVBX

QDVBX Risk / Return Rank: 15
QDVBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
QDVBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
QDVBX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
QDVBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
QDVBX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCRYX vs. QDVBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund (LCRYX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCRYX	QDVBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.03	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.58	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.18	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	1.29	+0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.31	3.67	+0.64

LCRYX vs. QDVBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCRYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the QDVBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCRYX and QDVBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCRYX vs. QDVBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCRYX drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, smaller than the maximum QDVBX drawdown of -19.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCRYX and QDVBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCRYX	QDVBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.82%	-19.86%	+1.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.05%	-3.00%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.77%	-5.37%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.82%	-19.86%	+1.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.50%	-2.31%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.85%	-6.64%	+3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	1.05%	+0.04%

Volatility

LCRYX vs. QDVBX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund (LCRYX) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX) at 1.03%. This indicates that LCRYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCRYX	QDVBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.19%	1.03%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.95%	2.64%	+0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.96%	3.75%	+0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.77%	6.61%	-0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.80%	6.21%	-1.41%

LCRYX vs. QDVBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCRYX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVBX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCRYX vs. QDVBX - Dividend Comparison

LCRYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than QDVBX's 3.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCRYX Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund	4.74%	4.68%	3.96%	4.16%	2.43%	1.91%	5.45%	2.73%	3.27%	2.48%	2.56%	2.93%
QDVBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans	3.51%	3.51%	3.52%	3.66%	2.56%	1.70%	3.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCRYX and QDVBX in my portfolio?

LCRYX and QDVBX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCRYX or QDVBX?

LCRYX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to QDVBX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCRYX dropped -18.82% vs QDVBX's -19.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCRYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.