PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCRYX vs. LALDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCRYX vs. LALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund (LCRYX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCRYX achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than LALDX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LCRYX has underperformed LALDX with an annualized return of 1.33%, while LALDX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.34% annualized return.


LCRYX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.30%
6M
-0.97%
YTD
-0.59%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
3.72%
5Y*
-0.61%
10Y*
1.33%
ALL TIME*
3.63%

LALDX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.26%
6M
0.43%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
2.93%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
1.97%
10Y*
2.34%
ALL TIME*
3.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LCRYX vs. LALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCRYX
Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund
-0.59%7.36%1.33%5.55%-14.16%-0.69%8.21%8.10%-0.28%3.46%
LALDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
0.83%5.70%4.48%4.76%-5.48%1.17%2.98%5.42%1.24%2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between LCRYX and LALDX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1997

0.59

The correlation between LCRYX and LALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCRYX vs. LALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LCRYX
LCRYX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
LCRYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCRYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCRYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
LCRYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCRYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

LALDX
LALDX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
LALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LCRYX vs. LALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund (LCRYX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCRYXLALDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.41

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

2.85

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.60

11.80

-9.20

LCRYX vs. LALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCRYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the LALDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCRYX and LALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCRYX vs. LALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCRYX drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, which is greater than LALDX's maximum drawdown of -10.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCRYX and LALDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCRYXLALDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.82%

-10.58%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-1.29%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.90%

-1.29%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.82%

-7.60%

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.82%

-9.67%

-9.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.18%

-0.26%

-2.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-0.82%

-2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

0.31%

+0.93%

Volatility

LCRYX vs. LALDX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund (LCRYX) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX) at 0.71%. This indicates that LCRYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCRYXLALDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

0.71%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.06%

2.07%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

2.52%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.77%

2.73%

+3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.80%

2.61%

+2.19%

LCRYX vs. LALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCRYX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than LALDX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCRYX vs. LALDX - Dividend Comparison

LCRYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than LALDX's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LALDX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
4.49%5.01%4.11%4.09%2.42%2.37%2.88%3.59%3.88%3.71%3.95%3.95%
LCRYX
Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund
4.38%4.68%3.96%4.16%2.43%1.91%5.45%2.73%3.27%2.48%2.56%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCRYX and LALDX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCRYX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to LALDX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCRYX dropped -18.82% vs LALDX's -10.58%.

LALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCRYX and LALDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer