QDVBX vs. FMBPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX) and Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX).
QDVBX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 13, 2019. FMBPX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Dec 20, 2007.
Performance
QDVBX vs. FMBPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QDVBX vs. FMBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | -0.11% | 7.64% | 1.62% | 6.37% | -14.31% | -0.37% | 6.70% | -0.10% |
FMBPX Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio | -0.18% | 9.03% | 1.04% | 4.44% | -12.21% | -1.35% | 4.77% | 0.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVBX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than FMBPX's -0.18% return.
QDVBX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- —
FMBPX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDVBX vs. FMBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVBX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FMBPX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
QDVBX vs. FMBPX — Risk / Return Rank
QDVBX
FMBPX
QDVBX vs. FMBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX) and Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVBX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 1.25 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.87 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.26 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.11 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.75 | 5.85 | -0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVBX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 1.25 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.03 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.25 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVBX and FMBPX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QDVBX vs. FMBPX - Dividend Comparison
QDVBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than FMBPX's 4.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 3.51% | 3.51% | 3.52% | 3.66% | 2.56% | 1.70% | 3.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FMBPX Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio | 4.60% | 4.87% | 4.29% | 3.46% | 2.29% | 1.96% | 2.68% | 3.23% | 3.14% | 2.83% | 2.72% | 2.65% |
Drawdowns
QDVBX vs. FMBPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVBX drawdown since its inception was -19.86%, which is greater than FMBPX's maximum drawdown of -18.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVBX and FMBPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVBX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.86% | -18.34% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | -3.15% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.86% | -18.02% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -2.19% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.80% | -3.29% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 1.13% | -0.23% |
Volatility
QDVBX vs. FMBPX - Volatility Comparison
Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX) and Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX) have volatilities of 1.48% and 1.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QDVBX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 1.53% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.54% | 3.02% | -0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.41% | 5.44% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.59% | 6.72% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.29% | 5.08% | +1.21% |