LCRYX vs. BBTBX
LCRYX (Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund) and BBTBX (Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, LCRYX returned 1.33%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for BBTBX. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LCRYX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for BBTBX.
Performance
LCRYX vs. BBTBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCRYX achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly higher than BBTBX's -0.94% return. Over the past 10 years, LCRYX has underperformed BBTBX with an annualized return of 1.33%, while BBTBX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.58% annualized return.
LCRYX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- 2.01%
- 3Y*
- 3.72%
- 5Y*
- -0.61%
- 10Y*
- 1.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.63%
BBTBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- 6M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 1Y
- 1.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LCRYX vs. BBTBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCRYX Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund | -0.59% | 7.36% | 1.33% | 5.55% | -14.16% | -0.69% | 8.21% | 8.10% | -0.28% | 3.46% |
BBTBX Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund | -0.94% | 7.82% | 1.89% | 5.41% | -13.49% | -1.12% | 8.54% | 9.15% | 0.13% | 4.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCRYX and BBTBX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2013 | 0.95 |
The correlation between LCRYX and BBTBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCRYX vs. BBTBX — Risk / Return Rank
LCRYX
BBTBX
LCRYX vs. BBTBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund (LCRYX) and Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund (BBTBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCRYX | BBTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.14 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.03 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.60 | 2.49 | +0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCRYX vs. BBTBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCRYX drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, roughly equal to the maximum BBTBX drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCRYX and BBTBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCRYX | BBTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -18.54% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.05% | -2.97% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.90% | -5.35% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.82% | -18.54% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.82% | -18.54% | -0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -2.45% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -3.89% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 1.21% | +0.03% |
Volatility
LCRYX vs. BBTBX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund (LCRYX) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund (BBTBX) at 0.94%. This indicates that LCRYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBTBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCRYX | BBTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 0.94% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.06% | 3.08% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.88% | 3.97% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.77% | 5.98% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.80% | 4.94% | -0.14% |
LCRYX vs. BBTBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCRYX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than BBTBX's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCRYX vs. BBTBX - Dividend Comparison
LCRYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than BBTBX's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBTBX Bridge Builder Core Bond Fund | 3.76% | 4.58% | 3.92% | 2.86% | 2.26% | 2.38% | 4.73% | 3.39% | 3.02% | 2.67% | 0.95% | 0.17% |
LCRYX Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund | 4.38% | 4.68% | 3.96% | 4.16% | 2.43% | 1.91% | 5.45% | 2.73% | 3.27% | 2.48% | 2.56% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, LCRYX and BBTBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LCRYX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to BBTBX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCRYX dropped -18.82% vs BBTBX's -18.54%.
LCRYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCRYX and BBTBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer