LCRYX vs. QDIBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund (LCRYX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX).
LCRYX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Mar 16, 1998. QDIBX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 13, 2019.
Performance
LCRYX vs. QDIBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCRYX vs. QDIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCRYX Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund | -0.64% | 7.36% | 1.33% | 5.55% | -14.16% | -0.69% | 8.21% | -0.17% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | -0.22% | 7.72% | 1.66% | 6.71% | -14.11% | -0.17% | 6.77% | -0.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCRYX achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than QDIBX's -0.22% return.
LCRYX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- -0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.64%
QDIBX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCRYX vs. QDIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCRYX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than QDIBX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCRYX vs. QDIBX — Risk / Return Rank
LCRYX
QDIBX
LCRYX vs. QDIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund (LCRYX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCRYX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 1.03 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 1.51 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.18 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 2.00 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.89 | 5.89 | -1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCRYX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.03 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.07 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.16 | +0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCRYX and QDIBX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LCRYX vs. QDIBX - Dividend Comparison
LCRYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than QDIBX's 3.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCRYX Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund | 4.33% | 4.68% | 3.96% | 4.16% | 2.43% | 1.91% | 5.45% | 2.73% | 3.27% | 2.48% | 2.56% | 2.93% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 3.51% | 3.50% | 3.55% | 3.65% | 2.51% | 1.80% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LCRYX vs. QDIBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCRYX drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, roughly equal to the maximum QDIBX drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCRYX and QDIBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCRYX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -19.63% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.96% | -2.58% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.82% | -19.63% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -1.98% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -6.52% | +3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.87% | +0.14% |
Volatility
LCRYX vs. QDIBX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund (LCRYX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) have volatilities of 1.58% and 1.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCRYX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 1.51% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.63% | 2.54% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 4.32% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.72% | 6.58% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.77% | 6.32% | -1.55% |