LCRDX vs. PTCRX
LCRDX (Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund) and PTCRX (Performance Trust Credit Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, LCRDX returned 3.09%/yr vs 3.58%/yr for PTCRX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCRDX charges 1.39%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PTCRX.
Performance
LCRDX vs. PTCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCRDX achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than PTCRX's 1.46% return.
LCRDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.09%
- 10Y*
- —
PTCRX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 5.60%
- 3Y*
- 7.90%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- —
LCRDX vs. PTCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCRDX Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund | 1.79% | 5.03% | 10.16% | 11.25% | -13.00% | 11.22% |
PTCRX Performance Trust Credit Fund | 1.46% | 6.58% | 8.01% | 10.10% | -10.71% | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCRDX and PTCRX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2021 | 0.38 |
The correlation between LCRDX and PTCRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCRDX vs. PTCRX — Risk / Return Rank
LCRDX
PTCRX
LCRDX vs. PTCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund (LCRDX) and Performance Trust Credit Fund (PTCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCRDX | PTCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 2.31 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.81 | 8.90 | -6.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCRDX vs. PTCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCRDX drawdown since its inception was -22.75%, which is greater than PTCRX's maximum drawdown of -14.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCRDX and PTCRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCRDX | PTCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.75% | -14.09% | -8.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.64% | -2.28% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.95% | -2.98% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.62% | -14.09% | +0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -0.55% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -3.35% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 0.59% | +1.03% |
Volatility
LCRDX vs. PTCRX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund (LCRDX) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to Performance Trust Credit Fund (PTCRX) at 0.81%. This indicates that LCRDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCRDX | PTCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 0.81% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.24% | 2.18% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.30% | 2.77% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.70% | 3.97% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 3.87% | +1.92% |
LCRDX vs. PTCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCRDX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than PTCRX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCRDX vs. PTCRX - Dividend Comparison
LCRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.72%, more than PTCRX's 5.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCRDX Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund | 10.72% | 9.81% | 9.09% | 9.54% | 5.10% | 9.71% | 4.24% |
PTCRX Performance Trust Credit Fund | 5.37% | 4.34% | 5.67% | 5.95% | 4.69% | 8.11% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCRDX and PTCRX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCRDX has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to PTCRX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCRDX dropped -22.75% vs PTCRX's -14.09%.
PTCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCRDX and PTCRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer