PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTCRX vs. PYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PTCRX vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Performance Trust Credit Fund (PTCRX) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PTCRX vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PTCRX
Performance Trust Credit Fund
-0.52%6.58%8.01%7.43%
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
-0.92%9.57%7.69%5.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTCRX achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's -0.92% return.


PTCRX

1D
0.45%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
-0.52%
6M
0.78%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*

PYLD

1D
0.50%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
-0.92%
6M
0.90%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PTCRX vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTCRX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PTCRX vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTCRX
PTCRX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PTCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PTCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTCRX vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Performance Trust Credit Fund (PTCRX) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTCRXPYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

1.72

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

2.39

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

1.84

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.50

7.60

+0.90

PTCRX vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTCRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTCRX and PYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTCRXPYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.72

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

1.99

-1.00

Correlation

The correlation between PTCRX and PYLD is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PTCRX vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

PTCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, less than PYLD's 6.36% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
PTCRX
Performance Trust Credit Fund
5.34%4.34%5.67%5.95%4.69%8.11%
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
6.36%6.21%6.40%2.72%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PTCRX vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTCRX drawdown since its inception was -14.09%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTCRX and PYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PTCRXPYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.09%

-4.52%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.32%

-3.25%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-2.28%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-0.64%

-2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

0.79%

-0.16%

Volatility

PTCRX vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Performance Trust Credit Fund (PTCRX) is 1.24%, while PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) has a volatility of 1.61%. This indicates that PTCRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PTCRXPYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

1.61%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.91%

2.12%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09%

3.43%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.95%

4.00%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.91%

4.00%

-0.09%