PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCRDX vs. BRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCRDX vs. BRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund (LCRDX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCRDX achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than BRW's 3.06% return.


LCRDX

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.32%
6M
0.15%
YTD
0.94%
1Y
2.71%
3Y*
6.63%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.98%

BRW

1D
-1.64%
1M
0.67%
6M
5.41%
YTD
3.06%
1Y
-8.59%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.26M$1.37M$1.47M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LCRDX vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LCRDX
Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund
0.94%5.03%10.16%11.25%-13.00%5.32%
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
3.06%5.89%12.16%18.49%-4.64%3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between LCRDX and BRW is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCRDX vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LCRDX
LCRDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LCRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
LCRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

BRW
BRW Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRW Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LCRDX vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund (LCRDX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCRDXBRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.90

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

-0.48

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.92

-0.80

+2.73

LCRDX vs. BRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCRDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the BRW Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCRDX and BRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCRDX vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCRDX drawdown since its inception was -22.75%, which is greater than BRW's maximum drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCRDX and BRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCRDXBRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.75%

-17.74%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.64%

-17.74%

+14.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.95%

-17.74%

+10.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.62%

-17.74%

+4.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-9.19%

+7.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-4.10%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

10.60%

-8.94%

Volatility

LCRDX vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund (LCRDX) is 0.85%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that LCRDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCRDXBRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

4.03%

-3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.25%

8.85%

-5.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35%

13.66%

-9.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.68%

13.01%

-8.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.77%

12.90%

-7.13%

LCRDX vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCRDX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCRDX vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison

LCRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.38%, less than BRW's 15.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
15.41%14.46%12.27%16.02%13.82%4.53%0.00%
LCRDX
Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund
10.38%9.81%9.09%9.54%5.10%9.71%4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCRDX and BRW have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRW has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to LCRDX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCRDX dropped -22.75% vs BRW's -17.74%.

LCRDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCRDX and BRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer