LCR vs. THRV
LCR (Leuthold Core ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCR charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
LCR vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCR achieves a 4.15% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.86% return.
LCR
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 4.15%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- 14.07%
- 3Y*
- 11.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.74%
- 10Y*
- —
THRV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCR vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LCR Leuthold Core ETF | 4.15% | 1.64% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.86% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCR and THRV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCR vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
LCR
THRV
LCR vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCR | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCR | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.04 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
LCR vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCR drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCR and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCR | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.44% | -1.50% | -15.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.51% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -0.44% | -2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | — | — |
Volatility
LCR vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCR | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.49% | 2.92% | +4.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.02% | 2.92% | +6.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.40% | 2.92% | +8.48% |
LCR vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCR vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
LCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than THRV's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCR Leuthold Core ETF | 1.31% | 1.37% | 1.86% | 1.60% | 0.75% | 0.21% | 0.62% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.71% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCR and THRV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 1.31% for LCR.
They also come from different issuers: The Leuthold Group LLC and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for LCR and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for LCR and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer