LCR vs. MDIV
LCR (Leuthold Core ETF) and MDIV (First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. LCR is actively managed, while MDIV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCR returned 6.85%/yr vs 6.77%/yr for MDIV. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for MDIV.
Performance
LCR vs. MDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCR achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly lower than MDIV's 11.80% return.
LCR
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 1Y
- 10.97%
- 3Y*
- 9.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- —
MDIV
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- YTD
- 11.80%
- 1Y
- 13.71%
- 3Y*
- 11.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.84%
LCR vs. MDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCR Leuthold Core ETF | 3.66% | 12.43% | 8.68% | 12.80% | -7.58% | 12.12% | 13.56% |
MDIV First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund | 11.80% | 3.77% | 10.05% | 11.50% | -3.86% | 16.51% | -14.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCR and MDIV is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2020 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LCR and MDIV has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCR vs. MDIV — Risk / Return Rank
LCR
MDIV
LCR vs. MDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) and First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCR | MDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.37 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 4.06 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 11.26 | -3.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCR vs. MDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCR drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, smaller than the maximum MDIV drawdown of -48.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCR and MDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCR | MDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.44% | -48.50% | +31.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.02% | -3.39% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.59% | -9.62% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.40% | -13.02% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | 0.00% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -4.55% | +1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.48% | 1.22% | +0.26% |
Volatility
LCR vs. MDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) is 1.73%, while First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) has a volatility of 1.93%. This indicates that LCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCR | MDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | 1.93% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.37% | 4.54% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.82% | 6.61% | +1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.06% | 10.92% | -1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 15.20% | -3.85% |
LCR vs. MDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MDIV's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCR vs. MDIV - Dividend Comparison
LCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than MDIV's 6.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCR Leuthold Core ETF | 1.32% | 1.37% | 1.86% | 1.60% | 0.75% | 0.21% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDIV First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund | 6.59% | 6.51% | 6.40% | 6.08% | 6.71% | 5.30% | 6.00% | 5.90% | 6.76% | 6.04% | 6.35% | 7.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCR and MDIV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDIV has higher volatility (1.93%) compared to LCR (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCR dropped -17.44% vs MDIV's -48.50%.
On 5-year performance, LCR leads with 6.85% vs 6.77% for MDIV. On fees, MDIV is cheaper at 0.73% per year. On volatility, LCR has been the lower-risk option at 1.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LCR has performed better with a 6.85% return vs 6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDIV is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LCR.
MDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.59%, compared with 1.32% for LCR.
They also come from different issuers: The Leuthold Group LLC and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for LCR and 0.73% for MDIV.
MDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCR and MDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer