LCO vs. MFUL
LCO (LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF) and MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCO charges 1.13%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for MFUL.
Performance
LCO vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCO
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFUL
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 2.64%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 6.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCO vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 8.18% |
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | 2.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCO and MFUL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCO vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank
LCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MFUL
LCO vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCO | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.84 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCO vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCO drawdown since its inception was -11.20%, smaller than the maximum MFUL drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCO and MFUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCO | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -16.41% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.49% | -1.08% | -5.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.51% | -9.39% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.89% | — |
Volatility
LCO vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCO | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.01% | 4.23% | +21.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.01% | 4.29% | +21.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.01% | 4.29% | +21.72% |
LCO vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCO has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCO vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison
LCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | 3.03% | 3.31% | 2.59% | 5.00% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCO and MFUL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFUL is cheaper at 1.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFUL is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for LCO.
MFUL has the higher dividend yield at 3.03%, compared with 0.00% for LCO.
They also come from different issuers: LOGIQ and Mohr Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for LCO and 1.10% for MFUL.
Find the right allocation for LCO and MFUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer