INCM vs. INKM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

INCM (Franklin Income Focus ETF) and INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INCM is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while INKM is a Global Equities fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, INCM returned 10.60%/yr vs 10.10%/yr for INKM. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. INCM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for INKM.

Performance

INCM vs. INKM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with INCM having a 5.80% return and INKM slightly higher at 5.91%.

INCM

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -0.84%
• YTD: 5.80%
• 6M: 5.84%
• 1Y: 14.29%
• 3Y*: 10.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INKM

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 5.91%
• 6M: 5.99%
• 1Y: 12.92%
• 3Y*: 10.10%
• 5Y*: 4.13%
• 10Y*: 5.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INCM vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF	5.80%	13.07%	6.80%	5.76%
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	5.91%	11.86%	5.70%	6.37%

Correlation

The correlation between INCM and INKM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023	0.81

The correlation between INCM and INKM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

INCM vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INCM

INCM Risk / Return Rank: 86
INCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
INCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
INCM Omega Ratio Rank: 84
INCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
INCM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

INKM

INKM Risk / Return Rank: 66
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 70
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INCM vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INCM	INKM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	2.12	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	3.01	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.40	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.50	2.85	+1.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.66	11.19	+7.46

INCM vs. INKM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCM Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the INKM Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCM and INKM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INCM vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCM drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum INKM drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCM and INKM.

Drawdown Indicators

	INCM	INKM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.84%	-28.58%	+20.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.19%	-4.55%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.84%	-9.25%	+1.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.18%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-0.68%	-0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-3.68%	+2.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.77%	1.16%	-0.39%

Volatility

INCM vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) at 1.84%. This indicates that INCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INKM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INCM	INKM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.40%	1.84%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.27%	4.78%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.57%	6.12%	-0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.28%	8.32%	-1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.28%	9.79%	-2.51%

INCM vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than INKM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

INCM vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison

INCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than INKM's 4.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF	5.11%	4.96%	5.06%	3.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	4.85%	5.82%	4.83%	4.56%	5.03%	3.74%	3.88%	4.38%	4.08%	3.10%	3.39%	3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INCM and INKM in my portfolio?

INCM and INKM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INCM or INKM?

INCM has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to INKM (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCM dropped -7.84% vs INKM's -28.58%.

Which ETF is better, INCM or INKM?

On 3-year performance, INCM leads with 10.60% vs 10.10% for INKM. On fees, INCM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, INKM has been the lower-risk option at 1.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INCM or INKM?

Over the 3-year period, INCM has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 10.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INCM or INKM?

INCM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for INKM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INCM or INKM?

INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 4.85% for INKM.

What is the main difference between INCM and INKM?

INCM is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while INKM is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for INCM and 0.50% for INKM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.