INCM vs. INKM
INCM (Franklin Income Focus ETF) and INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INCM is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while INKM is a Global Equities fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, INCM returned 10.54%/yr vs 9.41%/yr for INKM. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. INCM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for INKM.
Performance
INCM vs. INKM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INCM achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly higher than INKM's 6.55% return.
INCM
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 7.21%
- 1Y
- 13.56%
- 3Y*
- 10.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.50%
INKM
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 11.75%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 5.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.53M | $12.10M | $11.59M | |
| $294.57K | $201.29K | $258.16K |
INCM vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 7.21% | 13.07% | 6.80% | 5.76% |
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 6.55% | 11.86% | 5.70% | 6.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between INCM and INKM is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023 | 0.80 |
The correlation between INCM and INKM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INCM vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank
INCM
INKM
INCM vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INCM | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.37 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 2.58 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.77 | 10.16 | +6.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INCM vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INCM drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum INKM drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCM and INKM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INCM | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -28.58% | +20.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.19% | -4.55% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.84% | -7.36% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.45% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.07% | -3.66% | +2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 1.15% | -0.36% |
Volatility
INCM vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) at 1.25%. This indicates that INCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INKM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INCM | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 1.25% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.35% | 4.70% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.52% | 6.01% | -0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.22% | 8.31% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.22% | 9.74% | -2.52% |
INCM vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison
INCM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than INKM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
INCM vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison
INCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than INKM's 4.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 5.21% | 4.96% | 5.06% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 4.78% | 5.82% | 4.83% | 4.56% | 5.03% | 3.74% | 3.88% | 4.38% | 4.08% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 3.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INCM and INKM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INCM has higher volatility (1.54%) compared to INKM (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCM dropped -7.84% vs INKM's -28.58%.
On 3-year performance, INCM leads with 10.54% vs 9.41% for INKM. On fees, INCM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, INKM has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, INCM has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 9.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INCM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for INKM.
INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.21%, compared with 4.78% for INKM.
INCM is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while INKM is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for INCM and 0.50% for INKM.
INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INCM and INKM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer