LCO vs. BAMY
LCO (LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF) and BAMY (Brookstone Yield ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCO charges 1.13%/yr vs 1.48%/yr for BAMY.
Performance
LCO vs. BAMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAMY
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCO vs. BAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 11.44% |
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF | 0.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCO and BAMY is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCO vs. BAMY — Risk / Return Rank
LCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BAMY
LCO vs. BAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCO | BAMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.50 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 19.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCO vs. BAMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCO drawdown since its inception was -11.20%, which is greater than BAMY's maximum drawdown of -6.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCO and BAMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCO | BAMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -6.03% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -0.09% | -3.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -0.53% | -3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.55% | — |
Volatility
LCO vs. BAMY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCO | BAMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.73% | 4.58% | +21.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 5.99% | +19.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 5.99% | +19.74% |
LCO vs. BAMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCO has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMY's 1.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCO vs. BAMY - Dividend Comparison
LCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF | 7.56% | 7.16% | 8.20% | 1.96% |
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCO and BAMY have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCO is cheaper at 1.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCO is cheaper with a 1.13% expense ratio, compared with 1.48% for BAMY.
BAMY has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 0.00% for LCO.
They also come from different issuers: LOGIQ and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for LCO and 1.48% for BAMY.
Find the right allocation for LCO and BAMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer