LCLG vs. FTCS
Compare and contrast key facts about Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF (LCLG) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS).
LCLG and FTCS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCLG is an actively managed fund by Logan. It was launched on Jun 28, 2012. FTCS is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the The NASDAQ Capital Strength Index. It was launched on Jul 6, 2006.
Performance
LCLG vs. FTCS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCLG vs. FTCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCLG Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF | -6.09% | 18.15% | 32.04% | 35.45% | -8.58% |
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 0.58% | 6.46% | 11.19% | 8.48% | 2.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCLG achieves a -6.09% return, which is significantly lower than FTCS's 0.58% return.
LCLG
- 1D
- 3.93%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- YTD
- -6.09%
- 6M
- -5.94%
- 1Y
- 23.75%
- 3Y*
- 21.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTCS
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- -0.35%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 9.74%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCLG vs. FTCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCLG has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FTCS's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCLG vs. FTCS — Risk / Return Rank
LCLG
FTCS
LCLG vs. FTCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF (LCLG) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCLG | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.34 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 0.60 | +0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.08 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 0.63 | +1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 2.42 | +3.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCLG | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.34 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.51 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCLG and FTCS is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LCLG vs. FTCS - Dividend Comparison
LCLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCLG Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.97% | 2.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 1.11% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.47% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.93% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.15% | 1.43% | 1.50% |
Drawdowns
LCLG vs. FTCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCLG drawdown since its inception was -25.79%, smaller than the maximum FTCS drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCLG and FTCS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCLG | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.79% | -53.64% | +27.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -9.38% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.36% | -6.42% | -3.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -6.93% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 2.42% | +1.35% |
Volatility
LCLG vs. FTCS - Volatility Comparison
Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF (LCLG) has a higher volatility of 7.91% compared to First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) at 3.20%. This indicates that LCLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCLG | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.91% | 3.20% | +4.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.68% | 7.06% | +7.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.97% | 13.60% | +11.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 13.14% | +8.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 15.54% | +6.14% |