PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCII vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LCII vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LCI Industries (LCII) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCII achieves a -23.24% return, which is significantly lower than META's -14.42% return. Over the past 10 years, LCII has underperformed META with an annualized return of 4.36%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.64% annualized return.


LCII

1D
-0.64%
1M
-17.37%
YTD
-23.24%
6M
-24.65%
1Y
7.35%
3Y*
-4.15%
5Y*
-2.95%
10Y*
4.36%

META

1D
-2.32%
1M
-7.51%
YTD
-14.42%
6M
-14.61%
1Y
-17.09%
3Y*
25.36%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
17.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCII vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCII
LCI Industries
-23.24%22.83%-14.64%41.10%-38.49%23.07%24.13%65.13%-47.23%23.05%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-14.42%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LCII and META is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.28

The correlation between LCII and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LCII:

$2.22B

META:

$1.45T

EPS

LCII:

$7.63

META:

$27.47

PE Ratio

LCII:

11.96

META:

20.53

PEG Ratio

LCII:

0.44

META:

0.85

PS Ratio

LCII:

0.55

META:

6.74

PB Ratio

LCII:

1.63

META:

5.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

LCII:

$4.12B

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LCII:

$980.30M

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

LCII:

$381.13M

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCII vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCII
LCII Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
LCII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCII Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LCII Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCII Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCII vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LCI Industries (LCII) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCIIMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.94

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

-0.52

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.46

-1.04

+1.50

LCII vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCII Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCII and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCII vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCII drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCII and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCIIMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.55%

-76.74%

-10.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.76%

-33.30%

-8.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.76%

-34.15%

-7.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.19%

-76.74%

+29.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.89%

-76.74%

+22.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.73%

-28.39%

-12.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.26%

-15.84%

-9.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.03%

16.48%

-0.45%

Volatility

LCII vs. META - Volatility Comparison

LCI Industries (LCII) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) have volatilities of 12.64% and 12.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCIIMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.64%

12.93%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.79%

27.95%

-1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.50%

36.25%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.23%

44.18%

-4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.86%

38.77%

+1.09%

Dividends

LCII vs. META - Dividend Comparison

LCII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than META's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCII
LCI Industries
5.04%3.79%4.16%3.34%4.38%2.21%2.16%2.38%3.52%1.58%1.30%3.28%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.38%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LCII vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LCI Industries and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
932.70M
56.31B
(LCII) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LCII vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LCI Industries and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
22.1%
81.9%
Portfolio components
LCII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LCI Industries reported a gross profit of 205.91M and revenue of 932.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

LCII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LCI Industries reported an operating income of 35.36M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

LCII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LCI Industries reported a net income of 18.68M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LCII and META have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

META has higher volatility (12.93%) compared to LCII (12.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCII dropped -87.55% vs META's -76.74%.

LCII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCII and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer