PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCII vs. DOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LCII vs. DOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LCI Industries (LCII) and BRP Inc (DOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCII achieves a -23.24% return, which is significantly lower than DOO's -15.27% return. Over the past 10 years, LCII has underperformed DOO with an annualized return of 4.36%, while DOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.43% annualized return.


LCII

1D
-0.64%
1M
-17.37%
YTD
-23.24%
6M
-24.65%
1Y
7.35%
3Y*
-4.15%
5Y*
-2.95%
10Y*
4.36%

DOO

1D
0.44%
1M
7.95%
YTD
-15.27%
6M
-17.64%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
-7.67%
5Y*
-4.16%
10Y*
14.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCII vs. DOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCII
LCI Industries
-23.24%22.83%-14.64%41.10%-38.49%23.07%24.13%65.13%-47.23%23.05%
DOO
BRP Inc
-15.27%41.18%-28.32%-5.37%-12.35%33.74%44.98%77.45%-29.76%75.41%

Correlation

The correlation between LCII and DOO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2013

0.38

The correlation between LCII and DOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LCII:

$2.22B

DOO:

$4.43B

EPS

LCII:

$7.63

DOO:

CA$0.33

PE Ratio

LCII:

11.96

DOO:

256.37

PEG Ratio

LCII:

0.44

DOO:

7.53

PS Ratio

LCII:

0.55

DOO:

0.77

PB Ratio

LCII:

1.63

DOO:

11.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

LCII:

$4.12B

DOO:

CA$8.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LCII:

$980.30M

DOO:

CA$1.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

LCII:

$381.13M

DOO:

CA$916.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCII vs. DOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCII
LCII Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
LCII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCII Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LCII Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCII Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

DOO
DOO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCII vs. DOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LCI Industries (LCII) and BRP Inc (DOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCIIDOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.18

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

0.78

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.46

1.97

-1.51

LCII vs. DOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCII Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the DOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCII and DOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCII vs. DOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCII drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than DOO's maximum drawdown of -75.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCII and DOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCIIDOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.55%

-75.49%

-12.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.76%

-37.43%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.76%

-64.15%

+22.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.19%

-66.60%

+19.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.89%

-75.49%

+21.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.73%

-37.62%

-3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.26%

-24.92%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.03%

14.77%

+1.26%

Volatility

LCII vs. DOO - Volatility Comparison

LCI Industries (LCII) has a higher volatility of 12.64% compared to BRP Inc (DOO) at 9.04%. This indicates that LCII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCIIDOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.64%

9.04%

+3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.79%

51.29%

-24.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.50%

52.77%

-17.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.23%

43.48%

-4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.86%

46.37%

-6.51%

Dividends

LCII vs. DOO - Dividend Comparison

LCII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than DOO's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DOO
BRP Inc
1.40%1.09%1.20%0.82%0.64%0.61%0.13%0.66%1.05%0.51%0.00%0.00%
LCII
LCI Industries
5.04%3.79%4.16%3.34%4.38%2.21%2.16%2.38%3.52%1.58%1.30%3.28%

Financials

LCII vs. DOO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LCI Industries and BRP Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
932.70M
2.25B
(LCII) Total Revenue
(DOO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LCII values in USD, DOO values in CAD

LCII vs. DOO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LCI Industries and BRP Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

16.0%18.0%20.0%22.0%24.0%26.0%28.0%30.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
22.1%
24.1%
Portfolio components
LCII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LCI Industries reported a gross profit of 205.91M and revenue of 932.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.

DOO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BRP Inc reported a gross profit of 541.20M and revenue of 2.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.

LCII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LCI Industries reported an operating income of 35.36M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

DOO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BRP Inc reported an operating income of 202.60M and revenue of 2.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

LCII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LCI Industries reported a net income of 18.68M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

DOO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BRP Inc reported a net income of 69.10M and revenue of 2.25B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LCII and DOO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCII has higher volatility (12.64%) compared to DOO (9.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCII dropped -87.55% vs DOO's -75.49%.

DOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCII and DOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer