PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCII vs. PII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LCII vs. PII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LCI Industries (LCII) and Polaris Industries Inc. (PII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCII achieves a -13.97% return, which is significantly lower than PII's 8.30% return. Over the past 10 years, LCII has outperformed PII with an annualized return of 4.40%, while PII has yielded a comparatively lower -0.30% annualized return.


LCII

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.97%
6M
-28.84%
YTD
-13.97%
1Y
12.87%
3Y*
-5.15%
5Y*
-3.26%
10Y*
4.40%
ALL TIME*
15.13%

PII

1D
-1.63%
1M
6.27%
6M
7.30%
YTD
8.30%
1Y
41.13%
3Y*
-17.09%
5Y*
-9.59%
10Y*
-0.30%
ALL TIME*
14.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.27M$46.04M$48.13M
$66.71M$59.12M$57.88M

LCII vs. PII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCII
LCI Industries
-13.97%22.83%-14.64%41.10%-38.49%23.07%24.13%65.13%-47.23%23.05%
PII
Polaris Industries Inc.
8.30%15.90%-37.19%-3.79%-6.01%17.75%-3.78%36.37%-36.76%54.19%

Correlation

The correlation between LCII and PII is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1989

0.34

The correlation between LCII and PII shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LCII:

$2.49B

PII:

$3.82B

EPS

LCII:

$7.71

PII:

-$4.54

PS Ratio

LCII:

0.61

PII:

0.52

PB Ratio

LCII:

1.83

PII:

4.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

LCII:

$4.12B

PII:

$7.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LCII:

$980.30M

PII:

$1.56B

EBITDA (TTM)

LCII:

$381.13M

PII:

$116.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCII vs. PII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LCII
LCII Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LCII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCII Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCII Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
LCII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCII Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

PII
PII Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PII Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PII Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PII Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PII Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LCII vs. PII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LCI Industries (LCII) and Polaris Industries Inc. (PII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCIIPIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.15

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

0.95

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.63

2.77

-2.15

LCII vs. PII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCII Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the PII Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCII and PII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCII vs. PII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCII drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than PII's maximum drawdown of -77.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCII and PII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCIIPIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.55%

-77.57%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.76%

-34.21%

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.76%

-73.92%

+32.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.19%

-75.23%

+28.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.89%

-75.62%

+21.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.57%

-45.67%

+12.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.29%

-19.83%

-5.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.47%

11.70%

+7.77%

Volatility

LCII vs. PII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LCI Industries (LCII) is 9.91%, while Polaris Industries Inc. (PII) has a volatility of 12.07%. This indicates that LCII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCIIPIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.91%

12.07%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.49%

39.16%

-11.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.30%

51.50%

-15.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.37%

43.06%

-3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.94%

42.81%

-2.87%

Dividends

LCII vs. PII - Dividend Comparison

LCII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than PII's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCII
LCI Industries
4.49%3.79%4.16%3.34%4.38%2.21%2.16%2.38%3.52%1.58%1.30%3.28%
PII
Polaris Industries Inc.
4.03%4.24%4.58%2.74%2.53%2.29%2.60%2.40%3.13%1.87%2.67%2.47%

Financials

LCII vs. PII - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LCI Industries and Polaris Industries Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

LCII vs. PII - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LCI Industries and Polaris Industries Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

LCII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LCI Industries reported a gross profit of 205.91M and revenue of 932.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.

PII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Polaris Industries Inc. reported a gross profit of 478.30M and revenue of 2.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.7%.

LCII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LCI Industries reported an operating income of 35.36M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

PII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Polaris Industries Inc. reported an operating income of 132.00M and revenue of 2.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.5%.

LCII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LCI Industries reported a net income of 18.68M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

PII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Polaris Industries Inc. reported a net income of 106.40M and revenue of 2.02B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LCII and PII have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PII has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to LCII (9.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCII dropped -87.55% vs PII's -77.57%.

PII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCII and PII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer