LCII vs. PII
LCII (LCI Industries) and PII (Polaris Industries Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Recreational Vehicles industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, LCII returned 4.36%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for PII. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LCII vs. PII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCII achieves a -23.24% return, which is significantly lower than PII's 11.01% return. Over the past 10 years, LCII has outperformed PII with an annualized return of 4.36%, while PII has yielded a comparatively lower 1.33% annualized return.
LCII
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -17.37%
- YTD
- -23.24%
- 6M
- -24.65%
- 1Y
- 7.35%
- 3Y*
- -4.15%
- 5Y*
- -2.95%
- 10Y*
- 4.36%
PII
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 82.70%
- 3Y*
- -12.37%
- 5Y*
- -9.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.33%
LCII vs. PII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCII LCI Industries | -23.24% | 22.83% | -14.64% | 41.10% | -38.49% | 23.07% | 24.13% | 65.13% | -47.23% | 23.05% |
PII Polaris Industries Inc. | 11.01% | 15.90% | -37.19% | -3.79% | -6.01% | 17.75% | -3.78% | 36.37% | -36.76% | 54.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCII and PII is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1989 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, LCII and PII have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LCII:
$2.22B
PII:
$3.95B
LCII:
$7.63
PII:
-$7.82
LCII:
0.55
PII:
0.54
LCII:
1.63
PII:
5.26
LCII:
$4.12B
PII:
$7.27B
LCII:
$980.30M
PII:
$1.43B
LCII:
$381.13M
PII:
-$206.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCII vs. PII — Risk / Return Rank
LCII
PII
LCII vs. PII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LCI Industries (LCII) and Polaris Industries Inc. (PII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCII | PII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.28 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 2.43 | -2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.46 | 7.09 | -6.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCII vs. PII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCII drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than PII's maximum drawdown of -77.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCII and PII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCII | PII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.55% | -77.57% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.76% | -34.21% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.76% | -75.23% | +33.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.19% | -75.23% | +28.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.89% | -75.62% | +21.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.73% | -44.31% | +3.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.26% | -19.76% | -5.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.03% | 11.71% | +4.32% |
Volatility
LCII vs. PII - Volatility Comparison
LCI Industries (LCII) and Polaris Industries Inc. (PII) have volatilities of 12.64% and 12.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCII | PII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.64% | 12.38% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.79% | 38.54% | -11.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.50% | 56.38% | -20.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.23% | 42.89% | -3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.86% | 42.86% | -3.00% |
Dividends
LCII vs. PII - Dividend Comparison
LCII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than PII's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCII LCI Industries | 5.04% | 3.79% | 4.16% | 3.34% | 4.38% | 2.21% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 3.52% | 1.58% | 1.30% | 3.28% |
PII Polaris Industries Inc. | 3.93% | 4.24% | 4.58% | 2.74% | 2.53% | 2.29% | 2.60% | 2.40% | 3.13% | 1.87% | 2.67% | 2.47% |
Financials
LCII vs. PII - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LCI Industries and Polaris Industries Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LCII vs. PII - Profitability Comparison
LCII - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LCI Industries reported a gross profit of 205.91M and revenue of 932.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.
PII - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Polaris Industries Inc. reported a gross profit of 334.80M and revenue of 1.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.2%.
LCII - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LCI Industries reported an operating income of 35.36M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
PII - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Polaris Industries Inc. reported an operating income of -55.20M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.3%.
LCII - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LCI Industries reported a net income of 18.68M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
PII - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Polaris Industries Inc. reported a net income of -47.40M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in a net margin of -2.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LCII and PII have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCII has higher volatility (12.64%) compared to PII (12.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCII dropped -87.55% vs PII's -77.57%.
PII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCII and PII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer