PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DOO vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DOO vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BRP Inc (DOO) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOO achieves a -15.27% return, which is significantly lower than META's -14.42% return. Over the past 10 years, DOO has underperformed META with an annualized return of 14.43%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.64% annualized return.


DOO

1D
0.44%
1M
7.95%
YTD
-15.27%
6M
-17.64%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
-7.67%
5Y*
-4.16%
10Y*
14.43%

META

1D
-2.32%
1M
-7.51%
YTD
-14.42%
6M
-14.61%
1Y
-17.09%
3Y*
25.36%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
17.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOO vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DOO
BRP Inc
-15.27%41.18%-28.32%-5.37%-12.35%33.74%44.98%77.45%-29.76%75.41%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-14.42%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DOO and META is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2013

0.24

The correlation between DOO and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DOO:

$4.43B

META:

$1.45T

EPS

DOO:

CA$0.33

META:

$27.47

PE Ratio

DOO:

256.37

META:

20.53

PEG Ratio

DOO:

7.53

META:

0.85

PS Ratio

DOO:

0.77

META:

6.74

PB Ratio

DOO:

11.03

META:

5.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

DOO:

CA$8.08B

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DOO:

CA$1.76B

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

DOO:

CA$916.30M

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DOO vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOO
DOO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOO vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BRP Inc (DOO) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DOOMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.94

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

-0.52

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.97

-1.04

+3.01

DOO vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOO Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOO and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DOO vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOO drawdown since its inception was -75.49%, roughly equal to the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOO and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DOOMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.49%

-76.74%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.43%

-33.30%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.15%

-34.15%

-30.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.60%

-76.74%

+10.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.49%

-76.74%

+1.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.62%

-28.39%

-9.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.92%

-15.84%

-9.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.77%

16.48%

-1.71%

Volatility

DOO vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BRP Inc (DOO) is 9.04%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 12.93%. This indicates that DOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DOOMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.04%

12.93%

-3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.29%

27.95%

+23.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.77%

36.25%

+16.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.48%

44.18%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.37%

38.77%

+7.60%

Dividends

DOO vs. META - Dividend Comparison

DOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than META's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DOO
BRP Inc
1.40%1.09%1.20%0.82%0.64%0.61%0.13%0.66%1.05%0.51%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.38%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

DOO vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BRP Inc and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.25B
56.31B
(DOO) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. DOO values in CAD, META values in USD

DOO vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BRP Inc and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
24.1%
81.9%
Portfolio components
DOO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BRP Inc reported a gross profit of 541.20M and revenue of 2.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

DOO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BRP Inc reported an operating income of 202.60M and revenue of 2.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

DOO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BRP Inc reported a net income of 69.10M and revenue of 2.25B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DOO and META have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

META has higher volatility (12.93%) compared to DOO (9.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOO dropped -75.49% vs META's -76.74%.

DOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DOO and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer