PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCID vs. QLYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LCID vs. QLYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and Qualys, Inc. (QLYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCID achieves a -50.90% return, which is significantly lower than QLYS's -15.48% return.


LCID

1D
0.58%
1M
-11.13%
YTD
-50.90%
6M
-55.37%
1Y
-75.97%
3Y*
-54.39%
5Y*
-53.87%
10Y*

QLYS

1D
3.52%
1M
9.73%
YTD
-15.48%
6M
-19.23%
1Y
-19.98%
3Y*
-3.38%
5Y*
2.00%
10Y*
14.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCID vs. QLYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.
-50.90%-65.00%-28.27%-38.36%-82.05%280.12%-2.34%
QLYS
Qualys, Inc.
-15.48%-5.22%-28.56%74.89%-18.21%12.60%29.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LCID and QLYS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020

0.30

The correlation between LCID and QLYS shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LCID:

$17.04B

QLYS:

$4.01B

EPS

LCID:

-$3.19

QLYS:

$5.57

PS Ratio

LCID:

4.89

QLYS:

5.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

LCID:

$1.12B

QLYS:

$684.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LCID:

-$1.62B

QLYS:

$569.03M

EBITDA (TTM)

LCID:

-$3.03B

QLYS:

$252.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCID vs. QLYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCID
LCID Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
LCID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCID Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCID Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
LCID Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCID Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

QLYS
QLYS Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
QLYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLYS Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
QLYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLYS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCID vs. QLYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and Qualys, Inc. (QLYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCIDQLYSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.95

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

-0.40

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

-0.81

-0.50

LCID vs. QLYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCID Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the QLYS Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCID and QLYS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCID vs. QLYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCID drawdown since its inception was -99.19%, which is greater than QLYS's maximum drawdown of -68.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCID and QLYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCIDQLYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.19%

-68.48%

-30.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.98%

-50.46%

-34.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.21%

-62.99%

-31.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.15%

-62.99%

-36.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.11%

-45.44%

-53.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.33%

-20.93%

-55.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

57.83%

24.68%

+33.15%

Volatility

LCID vs. QLYS - Volatility Comparison

Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) has a higher volatility of 22.77% compared to Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) at 12.30%. This indicates that LCID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCIDQLYSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.77%

12.30%

+10.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.95%

36.52%

+15.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.03%

45.62%

+32.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.62%

39.93%

+41.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

86.71%

39.07%

+47.64%

Dividends

LCID vs. QLYS - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCID nor QLYS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LCID vs. QLYS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lucid Group, Inc. and Qualys, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M202220232024202520260
175.64M
(LCID) Total Revenue
(QLYS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LCID and QLYS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCID has higher volatility (22.77%) compared to QLYS (12.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCID dropped -99.19% vs QLYS's -68.48%.

QLYS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCID and QLYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer