PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCF vs. TSEL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCF vs. TSEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF (TSEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LCF having a 5.23% return and TSEL slightly higher at 5.24%.


LCF

1D
-0.42%
1M
2.89%
YTD
5.23%
6M
6.34%
1Y
22.60%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
10Y*

TSEL

1D
-1.12%
1M
6.14%
YTD
5.24%
6M
4.08%
1Y
12.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCF vs. TSEL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LCF and TSEL is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2025

0.82

The correlation between LCF and TSEL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCF vs. TSEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCF
LCF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCF Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

TSEL
TSEL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TSEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSEL Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TSEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSEL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCF vs. TSEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF (TSEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCFTSELDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

0.60

+1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.67

0.92

+1.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.12

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

0.56

+1.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.14

1.40

+6.74

LCF vs. TSEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the TSEL Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCF and TSEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCFTSELDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

0.60

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.44

+0.61

Drawdowns

LCF vs. TSEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCF drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, smaller than the maximum TSEL drawdown of -28.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCF and TSEL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCFTSELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.28%

-28.95%

+10.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-23.47%

+11.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-3.60%

+3.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-8.26%

+5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

9.44%

-6.62%

Volatility

LCF vs. TSEL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) is 2.42%, while Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF (TSEL) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that LCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCFTSELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

4.55%

-2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.01%

15.57%

-6.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.86%

20.30%

-8.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

26.78%

-11.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

26.78%

-11.31%

LCF vs. TSEL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TSEL's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCF vs. TSEL - Dividend Comparison

LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while TSEL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LCF
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
0.52%0.55%0.63%0.71%0.24%
TSEL
Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCF and TSEL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSEL has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to LCF (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCF dropped -18.28% vs TSEL's -28.95%.

On 1-year performance, LCF leads with 22.60% vs 12.17% for TSEL. On fees, TSEL is cheaper at 0.67% per year. On volatility, LCF has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LCF has performed better with a 22.60% return vs 12.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSEL is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LCF.

LCF has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for TSEL.

LCF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TSEL is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LCF and 0.67% for TSEL.

LCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCF and TSEL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer