LCF vs. SCHK

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

LCF (Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. LCF is actively managed, while SCHK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LCF returned 15.40%/yr vs 20.60%/yr for SCHK. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LCF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.

Performance

LCF vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCF achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than SCHK's 8.17% return.

LCF

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -3.66%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 6M: -0.47%
• 1Y: 12.81%
• 3Y*: 15.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHK

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -1.28%
• YTD: 8.17%
• 6M: 6.80%
• 1Y: 21.87%
• 3Y*: 20.60%
• 5Y*: 12.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCF vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF	0.46%	17.20%	20.71%	26.20%	-4.72%
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	8.17%	17.23%	24.48%	26.63%	-5.19%

Correlation

The correlation between LCF and SCHK is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2022	0.95

The correlation between LCF and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

LCF vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LCF	SCHK
Technology	32.9%	38.0%
Communication Services	16.9%	10.1%
Financial Services	15.4%	11.2%
Healthcare	10.8%	8.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	9.8%
Industrials	5.3%	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	4.3%
Energy	2.0%	3.2%
Real Estate	1.5%	2.0%
Basic Materials	0.5%	1.9%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

LCF vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCF

LCF Risk / Return Rank: 30
LCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
LCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LCF Omega Ratio Rank: 30
LCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
LCF Martin Ratio Rank: 33

SCHK

SCHK Risk / Return Rank: 58
SCHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SCHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SCHK Omega Ratio Rank: 55
SCHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SCHK Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCF vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCF	SCHK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	1.72	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	2.36	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.31	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	2.45	-1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.39	10.86	-6.47

LCF vs. SCHK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the SCHK Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCF and SCHK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCF vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCF drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCF and SCHK.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCF	SCHK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.28%	-34.80%	+16.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	-8.97%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.28%	-19.21%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.94%	-3.31%	-1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.82%	-5.16%	+2.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	2.02%	+0.90%

Volatility

LCF vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) is 4.45%, while Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that LCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCF	SCHK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	4.95%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.82%	10.07%	-0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.41%	12.82%	-0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.50%	17.34%	-1.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.50%	19.12%	-3.62%

LCF vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCF vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison

LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than SCHK's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF	0.54%	0.55%	0.63%	0.71%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	1.03%	1.09%	1.20%	1.38%	1.57%	1.17%	1.58%	1.82%	1.80%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCF and SCHK in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, LCF and SCHK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LCF or SCHK?

SCHK has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to LCF (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCF dropped -18.28% vs SCHK's -34.80%.

Which ETF is better, LCF or SCHK?

On 3-year performance, SCHK leads with 20.60% vs 15.40% for LCF. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, LCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LCF or SCHK?

Over the 3-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 20.60% return vs 15.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCF or SCHK?

SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LCF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCF or SCHK?

SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.54% for LCF.

What is the main difference between LCF and SCHK?

They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LCF and 0.03% for SCHK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.