PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCF vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCF vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCF achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.25% return.


LCF

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.09%
YTD
4.06%
6M
5.01%
1Y
20.57%
3Y*
17.35%
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCF vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LCF
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
4.06%17.20%20.71%26.20%-5.21%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-6.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LCF and ITOT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2022

0.95

The correlation between LCF and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

LCF vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LCF
ITOT

Technology

32.9%
33.8%

Communication Services

16.9%
10.3%

Financial Services

15.4%
12.1%

Healthcare

10.8%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
10.1%

Industrials

5.3%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
4.7%

Energy

2.0%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.4%

Basic Materials

0.5%
2.1%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

LCF
32.9%
ITOT
33.8%

Communication Services

LCF
16.9%
ITOT
10.3%

Financial Services

LCF
15.4%
ITOT
12.1%

Healthcare

LCF
10.8%
ITOT
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

LCF
8.4%
ITOT
10.1%

Industrials

LCF
5.3%
ITOT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

LCF
3.6%
ITOT
4.7%

Energy

LCF
2.0%
ITOT
3.7%

Real Estate

LCF
1.5%
ITOT
2.4%

Basic Materials

LCF
0.5%
ITOT
2.1%

Utilities

LCF

-

ITOT
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCF vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCF
LCF Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCF Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCF vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCFITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

3.17

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.32

14.57

-7.25

LCF vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCF and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCFITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.32

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.57

+0.46

Drawdowns

LCF vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCF drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCF and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCFITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.28%

-55.20%

+36.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-8.90%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.28%

-19.44%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-0.73%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-6.97%

+4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

1.94%

+0.88%

Volatility

LCF vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) is 2.69%, while iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that LCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCFITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

2.99%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

9.13%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.92%

12.20%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

17.36%

-1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

18.26%

-2.79%

LCF vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCF vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
LCF
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
0.52%0.55%0.63%0.71%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, LCF and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ITOT has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to LCF (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCF dropped -18.28% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 3-year performance, ITOT leads with 22.09% vs 17.35% for LCF. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, LCF has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 22.09% return vs 17.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LCF.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.52% for LCF.

They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LCF and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCF and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer