PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCF vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCF vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCF achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.14% return.


LCF

1D
-0.42%
1M
2.89%
YTD
5.23%
6M
6.34%
1Y
22.60%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFX

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.17%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCF vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LCF and BUFX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCF vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCF
LCF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCF Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCF vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCFBUFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.14

LCF vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCFBUFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

2.70

-1.65

Drawdowns

LCF vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCF drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCF and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCFBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.28%

-2.87%

-15.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.02%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-0.24%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

Volatility

LCF vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCFBUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.86%

3.99%

+7.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

3.99%

+11.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

3.99%

+11.48%

LCF vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCF vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUFX
FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCF
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
0.52%0.55%0.63%0.71%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCF and BUFX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCF is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCF is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

LCF has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

LCF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LCF and 0.96% for BUFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCF and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer