LCF vs. AFOS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LCF (Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.

Performance

LCF vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCF achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 31.60% return.

LCF

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -3.25%
• YTD: 0.88%
• 6M: 0.24%
• 1Y: 14.62%
• 3Y*: 15.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AFOS

• 1D: -3.79%
• 1M: 4.43%
• YTD: 31.60%
• 6M: 30.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCF vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF	0.88%	12.43%
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	31.60%	37.10%

Correlation

The correlation between LCF and AFOS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

LCF vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCF

LCF Risk / Return Rank: 33
LCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
LCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
LCF Omega Ratio Rank: 34
LCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
LCF Martin Ratio Rank: 36

AFOS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCF vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCF	AFOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.04	—	—

Drawdowns

LCF vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCF drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCF and AFOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCF	AFOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.28%	-11.52%	-6.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.54%	-3.79%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.82%	-1.42%	-1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LCF	AFOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.85%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.42%	21.52%	-9.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.51%	21.52%	-6.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.51%	21.52%	-6.01%

LCF vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCF vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than AFOS's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	0.23%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF	0.54%	0.55%	0.63%	0.71%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCF and AFOS in my portfolio?

LCF and AFOS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LCF or AFOS?

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCF or AFOS?

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LCF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCF or AFOS?

LCF has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.23% for AFOS.

What is the main difference between LCF and AFOS?

They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LCF and 0.45% for AFOS.