PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LCCN.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LCCN.L vs. MWRD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LCCN.L (Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc) and MWRD.L (Amundi Index MSCI World) are both exchange-traded funds - LCCN.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD, while MWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCCN.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for MWRD.L.

Performance

LCCN.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LCCN.L is traded in USD, while MWRD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MWRD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

LCCN.L

1D
-0.13%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
-7.04%
6M
-8.41%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
-4.89%
10Y*
—

MWRD.L

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCCN.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LCCN.L
Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc		-7.04%32.04%19.37%-11.61%-22.21%-21.87%29.79%21.86%1.99%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World		0.00%0.00%-1.64%23.69%-18.69%22.97%15.27%28.71%-7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between LCCN.L and MWRD.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2018

0.42

The correlation between LCCN.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LCCN.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
LCCN.L
MWRD.L

Consumer Cyclical

26.4%
10.5%

Financial Services

19.1%
14.7%

Communication Services

18.8%
7.5%

Technology

9.6%
24.7%

Basic Materials

5.5%
3.8%

Healthcare

5.4%
12.4%

Industrials

5.0%
10.6%

Energy

3.7%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
6.7%

Utilities

1.7%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

LCCN.L
26.4%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Financial Services

LCCN.L
19.1%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Communication Services

LCCN.L
18.8%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Technology

LCCN.L
9.6%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Basic Materials

LCCN.L
5.5%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Healthcare

LCCN.L
5.4%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Industrials

LCCN.L
5.0%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Energy

LCCN.L
3.7%
MWRD.L
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

LCCN.L
3.2%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Utilities

LCCN.L
1.7%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Real Estate

LCCN.L
1.5%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc

Amundi Index MSCI World

Often compared with LCCN.L:
LCCN.L vs. FLXC.LLCCN.L vs. CNAA.LLCCN.L vs. LHKG.DELCCN.L vs. PAXG.LLCCN.L vs. KWEBLCCN.L vs. qqqLCCN.L vs. XS6R.L
Often compared with MWRD.L:
MWRD.L vs. BRK-BMWRD.L vs. IWDA.ASMWRD.L vs. URTHMWRD.L vs. SWDA.LMWRD.L vs. JEPIMWRD.L vs. ACWIMWRD.L vs. 36BZ.DE

Return for Risk

LCCN.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LCCN.L
LCCN.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
LCCN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCCN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCCN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LCCN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCCN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCCN.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LCCN.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.25

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.50

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.61

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCCN.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LCCN.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

—

—

Drawdowns

LCCN.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LCCN.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.38%

—

—

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.98%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.52%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.10%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.07%

—

—

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.16%

—

—

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.15%

—

—

Volatility

LCCN.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LCCN.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.66%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.12%

—

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.33%

—

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.88%

—

—

LCCN.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCCN.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCCN.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCCN.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

LCCN.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for LCCN.L.

LCCN.L is categorized as China Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. LCCN.L tracks MSCI China NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LCCN.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCCN.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer