LCCN.L vs. LHKG.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L) and Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE).
LCCN.L and LHKG.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCCN.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jul 5, 2018. LHKG.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders. It was launched on Jul 11, 2023. Both LCCN.L and LHKG.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LCCN.L or LHKG.DE.
Key characteristics
| LCCN.L | LHKG.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.63% | 16.51% |
| 1Y Return | 16.57% | 7.34% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -9.55% | -6.48% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -1.82% | -4.62% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.37 | 0.35 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.74 | 0.72 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.09 | 1.08 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.17 | 0.20 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.09 | 0.89 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.56% | 10.34% |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.66% | 26.92% |
| Max Drawdown | -62.38% | -58.71% |
| Current Drawdown | -46.17% | -28.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCCN.L and LHKG.DE is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LCCN.L vs. LHKG.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LCCN.L achieves a 19.63% return, which is significantly higher than LHKG.DE's 16.51% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCCN.L vs. LHKG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCCN.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than LHKG.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LCCN.L vs. LHKG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L) and Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LCCN.L vs. LHKG.DE - Dividend Comparison
LCCN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LHKG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCCN.L Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist | 0.14% | 0.17% | 3.78% | 1.35% | 2.46% | 2.58% | 3.04% | 2.30% | 3.38% | 3.88% | 3.19% | 3.42% |
Drawdowns
LCCN.L vs. LHKG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCCN.L drawdown since its inception was -62.38%, which is greater than LHKG.DE's maximum drawdown of -58.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCCN.L and LHKG.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LCCN.L vs. LHKG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L) has a higher volatility of 10.98% compared to Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) at 10.21%. This indicates that LCCN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LHKG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.