LCCN.L vs. PAXG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L).
LCCN.L and PAXG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCCN.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jul 5, 2018. PAXG.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Apr 29, 2015. Both LCCN.L and PAXG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LCCN.L or PAXG.L.
Key characteristics
| LCCN.L | PAXG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.63% | 9.14% |
| 1Y Return | 16.57% | 16.63% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -9.55% | 7.53% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -1.82% | 10.18% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.37 | 1.44 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.74 | 2.17 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.09 | 1.26 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.17 | 1.28 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.09 | 7.37 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.56% | 2.71% |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.66% | 13.52% |
| Max Drawdown | -62.38% | -30.13% |
| Current Drawdown | -46.17% | -1.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCCN.L and PAXG.L is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LCCN.L vs. PAXG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LCCN.L achieves a 19.63% return, which is significantly higher than PAXG.L's 9.14% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCCN.L vs. PAXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCCN.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXG.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LCCN.L vs. PAXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LCCN.L vs. PAXG.L - Dividend Comparison
LCCN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCCN.L Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS | 3.69% | 4.03% | 4.47% | 3.74% | 2.81% | 4.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LCCN.L vs. PAXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCCN.L drawdown since its inception was -62.38%, which is greater than PAXG.L's maximum drawdown of -30.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCCN.L and PAXG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LCCN.L vs. PAXG.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L) has a higher volatility of 10.98% compared to Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) at 5.06%. This indicates that LCCN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.