LCCMX vs. SDIV
Compare and contrast key facts about Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV).
LCCMX is managed by LEADER. It was launched on Jul 14, 2005. SDIV is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index. It was launched on Jun 8, 2011.
Performance
LCCMX vs. SDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCCMX vs. SDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund | -2.35% | 9.73% | 18.51% | 13.73% | -13.30% | 1.30% | 7.52% | 0.65% | 2.35% | 1.89% |
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | 6.70% | 29.12% | 1.77% | 5.46% | -26.43% | 3.76% | -20.89% | 13.04% | -15.07% | 11.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCCMX achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than SDIV's 6.70% return. Over the past 10 years, LCCMX has outperformed SDIV with an annualized return of 3.75%, while SDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 0.55% annualized return.
LCCMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.56%
- 3Y*
- 12.42%
- 5Y*
- 4.85%
- 10Y*
- 3.75%
SDIV
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 6M
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- 32.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.59%
- 10Y*
- 0.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCCMX vs. SDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCCMX has a 2.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SDIV's 0.58% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCCMX vs. SDIV — Risk / Return Rank
LCCMX
SDIV
LCCMX vs. SDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCCMX | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 2.07 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | 2.66 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.41 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.43 | -0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.71 | 12.21 | -6.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCCMX | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.07 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.04 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.03 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.06 | +0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCCMX and SDIV is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LCCMX vs. SDIV - Dividend Comparison
LCCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, less than SDIV's 9.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund | 8.33% | 8.93% | 10.39% | 8.55% | 5.68% | 2.11% | 2.11% | 2.98% | 2.89% | 2.10% | 2.01% | 2.75% |
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | 9.10% | 9.59% | 11.33% | 11.73% | 14.17% | 8.95% | 7.96% | 8.73% | 9.22% | 6.66% | 6.95% | 7.33% |
Drawdowns
LCCMX vs. SDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCCMX drawdown since its inception was -24.57%, smaller than the maximum SDIV drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCCMX and SDIV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCCMX | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.57% | -56.90% | +32.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.76% | -13.37% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.20% | -41.94% | +22.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.57% | -56.90% | +32.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -17.21% | +13.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -18.63% | +15.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 2.66% | -1.60% |
Volatility
LCCMX vs. SDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) is 1.55%, while Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that LCCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCCMX | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.55% | 6.25% | -4.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.50% | 9.21% | -5.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.25% | 16.03% | -11.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 16.79% | -11.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.30% | 18.96% | -12.66% |