PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCAP vs. SELV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCAP vs. SELV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCAP achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly higher than SELV's 2.97% return.


LCAP

1D
0.78%
1M
3.26%
6M
11.00%
YTD
13.61%
1Y
24.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SELV

1D
-1.61%
1M
0.21%
6M
2.08%
YTD
2.97%
1Y
8.49%
3Y*
10.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCAP vs. SELV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LCAP and SELV is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

0.36

The correlation between LCAP and SELV shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCAP vs. SELV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCAP
LCAP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SELV
SELV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SELV Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SELV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCAP vs. SELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCAPSELVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.16

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

1.44

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.57

3.84

+6.73

LCAP vs. SELV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the SELV Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCAP and SELV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCAP vs. SELV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCAP drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum SELV drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCAP and SELV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCAPSELVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-13.73%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-5.92%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.95%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.66%

-2.37%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.22%

+0.14%

Volatility

LCAP vs. SELV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) is 3.81%, while SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that LCAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCAPSELVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

4.22%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

7.43%

+3.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

9.39%

+4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

11.92%

+4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

11.92%

+4.84%

LCAP vs. SELV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCAP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SELV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCAP vs. SELV - Dividend Comparison

LCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than SELV's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LCAP
Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF
0.09%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SELV
SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF
1.74%1.74%1.77%2.06%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCAP and SELV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SELV has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to LCAP (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCAP dropped -11.78% vs SELV's -13.73%.

On 1-year performance, LCAP leads with 24.93% vs 8.49% for SELV. On fees, SELV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, LCAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LCAP has performed better with a 24.93% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SELV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for LCAP.

SELV has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.09% for LCAP.

They also come from different issuers: Principal and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LCAP and 0.15% for SELV.

LCAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCAP and SELV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer