LCAP vs. FNDX
LCAP (Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCAP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Principal, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. LCAP is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. Over the past year, LCAP returned 27.27% vs 32.32% for FNDX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCAP charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
LCAP vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCAP achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.
LCAP
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 11.68%
- 1Y
- 27.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
LCAP vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LCAP Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF | 12.02% | 18.16% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.57% | 15.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCAP and FNDX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | 0.77 |
The correlation between LCAP and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
LCAP vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCAP
FNDX
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Technology
LCAP
FNDX
Consumer Cyclical
LCAP
FNDX
Financial Services
LCAP
FNDX
Communication Services
LCAP
FNDX
Healthcare
LCAP
FNDX
Industrials
LCAP
FNDX
Energy
LCAP
FNDX
Utilities
LCAP
FNDX
Basic Materials
LCAP
FNDX
Real Estate
LCAP
FNDX
Consumer Defensive
LCAP
FNDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCAP vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
LCAP
FNDX
LCAP vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCAP | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.14 | 3.18 | -1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.02 | 4.47 | -1.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.59 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 5.35 | -2.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.03 | 20.97 | -8.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCAP | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 3.18 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 0.79 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
LCAP vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCAP drawdown since its inception was -11.31%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCAP and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCAP | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.31% | -37.72% | +26.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -6.06% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.13% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -3.55% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 1.55% | +0.72% |
Volatility
LCAP vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.25%. This indicates that LCAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCAP | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 2.25% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.16% | 7.25% | +2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.82% | 10.22% | +2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 15.18% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 17.50% | -0.62% |
LCAP vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCAP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCAP vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
LCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
LCAP Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF | 0.10% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCAP and FNDX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCAP has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to FNDX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCAP dropped -11.31% vs FNDX's -37.72%.
On 1-year performance, FNDX leads with 32.32% vs 27.27% for LCAP. On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 32.32% return vs 27.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for LCAP.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.10% for LCAP.
LCAP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LCAP and 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCAP and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer