PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBTYA vs. LKQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LBTYA vs. LKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liberty Global plc (LBTYA) and LKQ Corporation (LKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBTYA achieves a -4.76% return, which is significantly higher than LKQ's -24.05% return. Over the past 10 years, LBTYA has underperformed LKQ with an annualized return of -4.14%, while LKQ has yielded a comparatively higher -2.96% annualized return.


LBTYA

1D
1.63%
1M
-6.11%
6M
-4.33%
YTD
-4.76%
1Y
0.66%
3Y*
3.71%
5Y*
-5.17%
10Y*
-4.14%
ALL TIME*
4.53%

LKQ

1D
-0.66%
1M
-15.44%
6M
-30.18%
YTD
-24.05%
1Y
-21.08%
3Y*
-23.64%
5Y*
-12.83%
10Y*
-2.96%
ALL TIME*
12.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$32.33M$24.96M$22.74M
$86.28M$75.75M$81.26M

LBTYA vs. LKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBTYA
Liberty Global plc
-4.76%-12.70%39.38%-6.13%-31.76%14.53%6.51%6.56%-40.46%17.16%
LKQ
LKQ Corporation
-24.05%-14.99%-20.92%-8.56%-9.24%71.09%-1.29%50.44%-41.65%32.69%

Correlation

The correlation between LBTYA and LKQ is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2004

0.36

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LBTYA:

$3.53B

LKQ:

$5.72B

EPS

LBTYA:

-$8.45

LKQ:

$1.78

PS Ratio

LBTYA:

0.77

LKQ:

0.42

PB Ratio

LBTYA:

0.38

LKQ:

0.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

LBTYA:

$4.88B

LKQ:

$13.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LBTYA:

$2.80B

LKQ:

$5.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

LBTYA:

-$1.03B

LKQ:

$1.28B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBTYA vs. LKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LBTYA
LBTYA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LBTYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBTYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBTYA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LBTYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBTYA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

LKQ
LKQ Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
LKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LBTYA vs. LKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liberty Global plc (LBTYA) and LKQ Corporation (LKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LBTYALKQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.92

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

-0.61

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.65

-1.48

+2.14

LBTYA vs. LKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBTYA Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the LKQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBTYA and LKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LBTYA vs. LKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBTYA drawdown since its inception was -79.08%, which is greater than LKQ's maximum drawdown of -68.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBTYA and LKQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBTYALKQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.08%

-68.02%

-11.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.63%

-34.09%

+8.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

-54.97%

+19.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.80%

-58.16%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.74%

-68.02%

+7.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.51%

-58.16%

+1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.52%

-16.23%

-15.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.01%

13.93%

-4.92%

Volatility

LBTYA vs. LKQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Liberty Global plc (LBTYA) is 10.62%, while LKQ Corporation (LKQ) has a volatility of 18.05%. This indicates that LBTYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBTYALKQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.62%

18.05%

-7.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.69%

28.70%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.39%

34.81%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.22%

30.77%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.97%

34.09%

-2.12%

Dividends

LBTYA vs. LKQ - Dividend Comparison

LBTYA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LBTYA
Liberty Global plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.08%
LKQ
LKQ Corporation
5.35%3.97%3.27%2.35%1.92%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LBTYA vs. LKQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liberty Global plc and LKQ Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

LBTYA vs. LKQ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Liberty Global plc and LKQ Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

LBTYA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liberty Global plc reported a gross profit of 315.30M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.

LKQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LKQ Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.32B and revenue of 3.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.

LBTYA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liberty Global plc reported an operating income of 3.00M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

LKQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LKQ Corporation reported an operating income of 225.00M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.

LBTYA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liberty Global plc reported a net income of -312.20M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of -26.6%.

LKQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LKQ Corporation reported a net income of 132.00M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LBTYA and LKQ have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LKQ has higher volatility (18.05%) compared to LBTYA (10.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBTYA dropped -79.08% vs LKQ's -68.02%.

LBTYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBTYA and LKQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer