LBSAX vs. CDDYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LBSAX (Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A) and CDDYX (Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds from Columbia. Over the past 10 years, LBSAX returned 12.20%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for CDDYX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LBSAX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CDDYX.

Performance

LBSAX vs. CDDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LBSAX having a 7.98% return and CDDYX slightly higher at 8.15%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LBSAX having a 12.20% annualized return and CDDYX not far ahead at 12.64%.

LBSAX

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 7.98%
• 6M: 8.29%
• 1Y: 20.04%
• 3Y*: 16.29%
• 5Y*: 10.41%
• 10Y*: 12.20%

CDDYX

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 8.15%
• 6M: 8.50%
• 1Y: 20.48%
• 3Y*: 16.70%
• 5Y*: 10.80%
• 10Y*: 12.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBSAX vs. CDDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LBSAX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A	7.98%	15.58%	14.73%	10.26%	-5.19%	25.97%	7.48%	27.84%	-4.62%	19.96%
CDDYX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class	8.15%	15.95%	15.17%	10.65%	-4.84%	26.43%	7.92%	28.74%	-4.27%	20.34%

Correlation

The correlation between LBSAX and CDDYX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2012	1.00

The correlation between LBSAX and CDDYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LBSAX vs. CDDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBSAX

LBSAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
LBSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
LBSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
LBSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
LBSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LBSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

CDDYX

CDDYX Risk / Return Rank: 68
CDDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CDDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CDDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
CDDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
CDDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBSAX vs. CDDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LBSAX	CDDYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.33	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	3.33	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.41	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.74	3.83	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.05	14.44	-0.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LBSAX vs. CDDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBSAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the CDDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBSAX and CDDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LBSAX	CDDYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	2.33	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.82	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.81	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.88	-0.25

Drawdowns

LBSAX vs. CDDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBSAX drawdown since its inception was -47.89%, which is greater than CDDYX's maximum drawdown of -32.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBSAX and CDDYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LBSAX	CDDYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.89%	-32.74%	-15.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.52%	-5.51%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.03%	-12.99%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.16%	-16.91%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.82%	-32.74%	-0.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-0.30%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.25%	-2.77%	-2.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.47%	1.46%	+0.01%

Volatility

LBSAX vs. CDDYX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) have volatilities of 2.47% and 2.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LBSAX	CDDYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.47%	2.48%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.89%	6.87%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.08%	9.07%	+0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.26%	13.27%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.69%	15.69%	0.00%

LBSAX vs. CDDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBSAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CDDYX's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

LBSAX vs. CDDYX - Dividend Comparison

LBSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, less than CDDYX's 4.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDDYX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class	4.97%	5.33%	5.99%	4.96%	3.90%	2.93%	1.85%	3.28%	7.65%	4.03%	3.84%	8.35%
LBSAX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A	4.77%	5.11%	5.78%	4.72%	3.62%	2.65%	1.52%	2.68%	7.36%	3.83%	3.60%	8.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LBSAX and CDDYX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, LBSAX and CDDYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LBSAX or CDDYX?

CDDYX has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to LBSAX (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBSAX dropped -47.89% vs CDDYX's -32.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CDDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.