LBS.TO vs. ATH.TO
LBS.TO (Life & Banc Split Corp.) and ATH.TO (Athabasca Oil Corporation) are both stocks. LBS.TO operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while ATH.TO operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, LBS.TO returned 30.61%/yr vs 21.70%/yr for ATH.TO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LBS.TO vs. ATH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBS.TO achieves a 92.41% return, which is significantly higher than ATH.TO's 44.95% return. Over the past 10 years, LBS.TO has outperformed ATH.TO with an annualized return of 30.61%, while ATH.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 21.70% annualized return.
LBS.TO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 32.16%
- YTD
- 92.41%
- 6M
- 90.38%
- 1Y
- 162.44%
- 3Y*
- 60.88%
- 5Y*
- 39.30%
- 10Y*
- 30.61%
ATH.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -6.60%
- YTD
- 44.95%
- 6M
- 45.36%
- 1Y
- 81.64%
- 3Y*
- 52.56%
- 5Y*
- 59.73%
- 10Y*
- 21.70%
LBS.TO vs. ATH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBS.TO Life & Banc Split Corp. | 92.41% | 55.41% | 38.56% | 10.41% | 0.97% | 65.80% | -3.16% | 44.97% | -20.15% | 19.78% |
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 44.95% | 31.89% | 27.82% | 73.03% | 102.52% | 600.00% | -71.19% | -40.40% | -7.48% | -47.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between LBS.TO and ATH.TO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010 | 0.22 |
The correlation between LBS.TO and ATH.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LBS.TO:
CA$682.46M
ATH.TO:
CA$4.95B
LBS.TO:
CA$8.45
ATH.TO:
CA$0.45
LBS.TO:
1.57
ATH.TO:
22.82
LBS.TO:
0.04
ATH.TO:
0.87
LBS.TO:
4.03
ATH.TO:
3.71
LBS.TO:
1.01
ATH.TO:
2.68
LBS.TO:
CA$169.21M
ATH.TO:
CA$1.35B
LBS.TO:
CA$160.11M
ATH.TO:
CA$518.18M
LBS.TO:
CA$425.46M
ATH.TO:
CA$505.02M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LBS.TO vs. ATH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LBS.TO
ATH.TO
LBS.TO vs. ATH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LBS.TO | ATH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.87 | 1.35 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.43 | 4.00 | +2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.45 | 12.30 | +16.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LBS.TO vs. ATH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBS.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.14%, smaller than the maximum ATH.TO drawdown of -99.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBS.TO and ATH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBS.TO | ATH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.14% | -99.41% | +16.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.43% | -20.50% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.23% | -25.62% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.44% | -43.37% | +7.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.25% | -94.63% | +31.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -45.24% | +43.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -73.56% | +61.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.73% | 6.66% | -0.93% |
Volatility
LBS.TO vs. ATH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) have volatilities of 12.99% and 12.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LBS.TO | ATH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | 12.89% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.15% | 32.02% | +10.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.20% | 37.70% | +7.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.58% | 49.58% | -19.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.24% | 61.54% | -22.30% |
Dividends
LBS.TO vs. ATH.TO - Dividend Comparison
LBS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%, while ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LBS.TO Life & Banc Split Corp. | 7.21% | 12.92% | 17.12% | 19.61% | 17.88% | 15.33% | 7.16% | 19.39% | 23.12% | 15.52% | 15.92% | 19.20% |
Financials
LBS.TO vs. ATH.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Life & Banc Split Corp. and Athabasca Oil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LBS.TO and ATH.TO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LBS.TO and ATH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer