PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LBS.TO vs. DFN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

LBS.TO vs. DFN.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) and Dividend 15 Split Corp. (DFN.TO).

Performance

LBS.TO vs. DFN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) and Dividend 15 Split Corp. (DFN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LBS.TO vs. DFN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.		-3.37%64.98%32.81%5.77%-2.76%59.70%-4.64%38.79%-23.29%15.61%
DFN.TO
Dividend 15 Split Corp.		0.09%46.96%38.64%-19.97%9.39%37.70%-11.45%27.39%-19.31%13.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LBS.TO:

CA$586.59M

DFN.TO:

CA$996.18M

EPS

LBS.TO:

CA$8.88

DFN.TO:

CA$2.66

PE Ratio

LBS.TO:

1.28

DFN.TO:

2.74

PEG Ratio

LBS.TO:

0.03

DFN.TO:

0.09

PS Ratio

LBS.TO:

3.30

DFN.TO:

6.97

PB Ratio

LBS.TO:

0.87

DFN.TO:

0.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

LBS.TO:

CA$169.21M

DFN.TO:

CA$138.51M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LBS.TO:

CA$160.11M

DFN.TO:

CA$125.98M

EBITDA (TTM)

LBS.TO:

CA$425.46M

DFN.TO:

CA$382.25M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBS.TO achieves a -3.37% return, which is significantly lower than DFN.TO's 0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, LBS.TO has outperformed DFN.TO with an annualized return of 18.83%, while DFN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.11% annualized return.

LBS.TO

1D
1.97%
1M
-7.18%
YTD
-3.37%
6M
22.10%
1Y
64.74%
3Y*
29.17%
5Y*
22.61%
10Y*
18.83%

DFN.TO

1D
0.14%
1M
-5.57%
YTD
0.09%
6M
15.40%
1Y
57.31%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
15.48%
10Y*
11.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Life & Banc Split Corp.

Dividend 15 Split Corp.

Often compared with LBS.TO:
LBS.TO vs. BK.TOLBS.TO vs. SBC.TOLBS.TO vs. FTN.TOLBS.TO vs. LCS.TOLBS.TO vs. BCE.TOLBS.TO vs. VDY.TOLBS.TO vs. GDV.TO
Often compared with DFN.TO:
DFN.TO vs. DF.TODFN.TO vs. FFN.TODFN.TO vs. FTN.TODFN.TO vs. DGS.TODFN.TO vs. BK.TODFN.TO vs. SBC.TODFN.TO vs. GDV.TO

Return for Risk

LBS.TO vs. DFN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LBS.TO
LBS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
DFN.TO
DFN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DFN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DFN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBS.TO vs. DFN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) and Dividend 15 Split Corp. (DFN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LBS.TODFN.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.11

3.16

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.70

3.96

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.68

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

4.93

-0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.47

23.37

-1.90

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LBS.TO vs. DFN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is comparable to the DFN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBS.TO and DFN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LBS.TODFN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

3.16

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.60

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.37

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.31

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between LBS.TO and DFN.TO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LBS.TO vs. DFN.TO - Dividend Comparison

LBS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, less than DFN.TO's 15.09% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.		9.19%9.34%13.29%15.23%13.89%11.89%5.56%15.06%17.96%12.05%12.35%14.91%
DFN.TO
Dividend 15 Split Corp.		15.09%16.06%17.92%14.87%15.94%15.00%11.83%13.99%15.54%12.00%11.17%11.76%

Drawdowns

LBS.TO vs. DFN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBS.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.80%, which is greater than DFN.TO's maximum drawdown of -73.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBS.TO and DFN.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

LBS.TODFN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.80%

-73.88%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.34%

-11.45%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.58%

-55.26%

+15.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.35%

-58.39%

-4.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.81%

-7.12%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.92%

-11.58%

-2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.42%

+0.72%

Volatility

LBS.TO vs. DFN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.01% compared to Dividend 15 Split Corp. (DFN.TO) at 11.02%. This indicates that LBS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

LBS.TODFN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.01%

11.02%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.18%

14.59%

+2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.95%

18.21%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.38%

25.92%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.14%

30.31%

+6.83%

Financials

LBS.TO vs. DFN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Life & Banc Split Corp. and Dividend 15 Split Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

0.0050.00M100.00M20212022202320242025
41.60M
43.47M
(LBS.TO) Total Revenue
(DFN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items