LBO vs. IAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LBO (WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF) and IAT (iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. LBO is actively managed, while IAT is passively managed. Over the past year, LBO returned -13.50% vs 22.99% for IAT. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LBO charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IAT.

Performance

LBO vs. IAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) and iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBO achieves a -14.28% return, which is significantly lower than IAT's 2.80% return.

LBO

• 1D: -3.31%
• 1M: -6.31%
• YTD: -14.28%
• 6M: -13.74%
• 1Y: -13.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IAT

• 1D: -1.71%
• 1M: -1.74%
• YTD: 2.80%
• 6M: 7.09%
• 1Y: 22.99%
• 3Y*: 22.20%
• 5Y*: 1.35%
• 10Y*: 7.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBO vs. IAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LBO WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF	-14.28%	-6.41%	30.93%	7.27%
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF	2.80%	13.05%	24.36%	14.56%

Correlation

The correlation between LBO and IAT is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023	0.63

The correlation between LBO and IAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

LBO vs. IAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LBO	IAT
Financial Services	96.0%	100.0%
Industrials	4.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LBO vs. IAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBO

LBO Risk / Return Rank: 4
LBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
LBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

IAT

IAT Risk / Return Rank: 27
IAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
IAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
IAT Omega Ratio Rank: 29
IAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
IAT Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBO vs. IAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) and iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LBO	IAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	1.06	-1.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.75	1.52	-2.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.20	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.46	1.32	-1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.95	3.38	-4.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LBO vs. IAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBO Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the IAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBO and IAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LBO	IAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63	1.06	-1.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.10	+0.14

Drawdowns

LBO vs. IAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBO drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum IAT drawdown of -77.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBO and IAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LBO	IAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.40%	-77.22%	+45.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.19%	-17.49%	-11.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.55%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-55.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.64%	-9.75%	-14.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.34%	-26.97%	+18.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.23%	6.81%	+7.42%

Volatility

LBO vs. IAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) is 5.68%, while iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) has a volatility of 6.12%. This indicates that LBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LBO	IAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.68%	6.12%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.11%	15.74%	+2.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.56%	21.86%	-0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.20%	29.03%	-7.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.20%	30.78%	-9.58%

LBO vs. IAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than IAT's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

LBO vs. IAT - Dividend Comparison

LBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, more than IAT's 2.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF	2.88%	2.94%	2.95%	3.56%	3.12%	1.88%	2.87%	2.49%	2.48%	1.55%	1.52%	1.78%
LBO WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF	7.95%	7.04%	5.79%	1.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LBO and IAT in my portfolio?

LBO and IAT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LBO or IAT?

IAT has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to LBO (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBO dropped -31.40% vs IAT's -77.22%.

Which ETF is better, LBO or IAT?

On 1-year performance, IAT leads with 22.99% vs -13.50% for LBO. On fees, IAT is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, LBO has been the lower-risk option at 5.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LBO or IAT?

Over the 1-year period, IAT has performed better with a 22.99% return vs -13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LBO or IAT?

IAT is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LBO or IAT?

LBO has the higher dividend yield at 7.95%, compared with 2.88% for IAT.

What is the main difference between LBO and IAT?

They also come from different issuers: White Wolf and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LBO and 0.42% for IAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.