LBNK.DE vs. IS3N.DE
LBNK.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - LBNK.DE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Banks, while IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LBNK.DE returned 14.15%/yr vs 10.00%/yr for IS3N.DE. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LBNK.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IS3N.DE.
Performance
LBNK.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBNK.DE achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LBNK.DE has outperformed IS3N.DE with an annualized return of 14.15%, while IS3N.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.00% annualized return.
LBNK.DE
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- 1Y
- 40.00%
- 3Y*
- 42.34%
- 5Y*
- 27.76%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 26.34%
- 1Y
- 45.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
LBNK.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBNK.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc | 7.56% | 76.66% | 32.67% | 26.48% | 1.30% | 37.71% | -24.17% | 14.90% | -25.93% | 11.91% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.82% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | -14.09% | 7.38% | 7.07% | 21.01% | -11.06% | 20.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between LBNK.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014 | 0.51 |
The correlation between LBNK.DE and IS3N.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LBNK.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LBNK.DE
IS3N.DE
LBNK.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LBNK.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.49 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 4.42 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.86 | 16.00 | -7.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LBNK.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 2.69 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | 0.53 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.55 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.44 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
LBNK.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBNK.DE drawdown since its inception was -81.84%, which is greater than IS3N.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBNK.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBNK.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.84% | -35.06% | -46.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.83% | -10.52% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.26% | -19.17% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.82% | -22.01% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.08% | -32.51% | -23.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -2.49% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.20% | -9.30% | -43.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 2.91% | +1.74% |
Volatility
LBNK.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) is 5.68%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that LBNK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LBNK.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 7.16% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.02% | 14.69% | +3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.10% | 17.32% | +4.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 16.19% | +6.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.34% | 18.04% | +7.30% |
LBNK.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LBNK.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
LBNK.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LBNK.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LBNK.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LBNK.DE.
LBNK.DE is categorized as Financials Equities, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. LBNK.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Banks, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LBNK.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
Find the right allocation for LBNK.DE and IS3N.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer