LBNDX vs. LABFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) and Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX).
LBNDX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Mar 31, 1971. LABFX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Dec 26, 1994.
Performance
LBNDX vs. LABFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LBNDX vs. LABFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBNDX Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund | -1.89% | 8.42% | 6.29% | 6.38% | -13.67% | 3.25% | 7.65% | 13.40% | -3.76% | 9.23% |
LABFX Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund | -2.94% | 12.93% | 15.10% | 11.91% | -16.16% | 4.46% | 19.37% | 19.78% | -10.25% | 8.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBNDX achieves a -1.89% return, which is significantly higher than LABFX's -2.94% return. Over the past 10 years, LBNDX has underperformed LABFX with an annualized return of 4.27%, while LABFX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.73% annualized return.
LBNDX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- -1.89%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- 1Y
- 5.50%
- 3Y*
- 5.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.23%
- 10Y*
- 4.27%
LABFX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- -2.94%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- 1Y
- 10.06%
- 3Y*
- 11.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- 6.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LBNDX vs. LABFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LBNDX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than LABFX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LBNDX vs. LABFX — Risk / Return Rank
LBNDX
LABFX
LBNDX vs. LABFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) and Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LBNDX | LABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 1.09 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 1.54 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 1.38 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.44 | 5.73 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LBNDX | LABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.09 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.33 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.59 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.60 | +0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between LBNDX and LABFX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LBNDX vs. LABFX - Dividend Comparison
LBNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, more than LABFX's 2.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBNDX Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund | 5.60% | 5.92% | 5.38% | 4.66% | 3.67% | 3.71% | 3.72% | 4.02% | 6.43% | 4.82% | 4.58% | 5.50% |
LABFX Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund | 2.15% | 2.27% | 2.52% | 2.25% | 1.81% | 13.30% | 5.83% | 3.04% | 5.83% | 4.39% | 3.32% | 7.83% |
Drawdowns
LBNDX vs. LABFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBNDX drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, smaller than the maximum LABFX drawdown of -41.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBNDX and LABFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBNDX | LABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.67% | -41.58% | +14.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.08% | -6.86% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.33% | -26.26% | +8.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.77% | -26.26% | +6.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.81% | -6.10% | +2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -5.20% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 1.66% | -0.58% |
Volatility
LBNDX vs. LABFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) is 1.77%, while Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that LBNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LABFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LBNDX | LABFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.77% | 3.18% | -1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | 5.79% | -2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 9.52% | -5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.63% | 10.35% | -5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.02% | 11.37% | -6.35% |