PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBNDX vs. LABFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LBNDX vs. LABFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) and Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBNDX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than LABFX's 4.98% return. Over the past 10 years, LBNDX has underperformed LABFX with an annualized return of 3.81%, while LABFX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.98% annualized return.


LBNDX

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.39%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
0.17%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
1.16%
10Y*
3.81%
ALL TIME*
5.67%

LABFX

1D
1.23%
1M
-0.85%
6M
3.11%
YTD
4.98%
1Y
11.63%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
6.98%
ALL TIME*
6.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LBNDX vs. LABFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
0.17%8.42%6.29%6.38%-13.67%3.25%7.65%13.40%-3.76%9.23%
LABFX
Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund
4.98%12.93%15.10%11.91%-16.16%4.46%19.37%19.78%-10.25%8.84%

Correlation

The correlation between LBNDX and LABFX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1994

0.63

The correlation between LBNDX and LABFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBNDX vs. LABFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LBNDX
LBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

LABFX
LABFX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
LABFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LABFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LBNDX vs. LABFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) and Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LBNDXLABFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.82

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

7.47

-2.90

LBNDX vs. LABFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBNDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the LABFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBNDX and LABFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LBNDX vs. LABFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBNDX drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, smaller than the maximum LABFX drawdown of -41.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBNDX and LABFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBNDXLABFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.67%

-41.58%

+14.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.08%

-6.10%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.51%

-10.38%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.33%

-26.26%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.77%

-26.26%

+6.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-1.47%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-5.16%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

1.48%

-0.41%

Volatility

LBNDX vs. LABFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) is 0.83%, while Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX) has a volatility of 2.51%. This indicates that LBNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LABFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBNDXLABFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

2.51%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.25%

6.91%

-3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

8.36%

-4.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.71%

10.42%

-5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

11.34%

-6.34%

LBNDX vs. LABFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBNDX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than LABFX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

LBNDX vs. LABFX - Dividend Comparison

LBNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, more than LABFX's 2.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LABFX
Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund
2.08%2.27%2.52%2.25%1.81%13.30%5.83%3.04%5.83%4.39%3.32%7.83%
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
5.67%5.92%5.38%4.66%3.67%3.71%3.72%4.02%6.43%4.82%4.58%5.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


LBNDX and LABFX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LABFX has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to LBNDX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBNDX dropped -26.67% vs LABFX's -41.58%.

LABFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBNDX and LABFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer