LABFX vs. LUBYX
LABFX (Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund) and LUBYX (Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - LABFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Lord Abbett, while LUBYX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 5 years, LABFX returned 4.79%/yr vs 3.33%/yr for LUBYX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LABFX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for LUBYX.
Performance
LABFX vs. LUBYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LABFX achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly higher than LUBYX's 1.34% return.
LABFX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 5.39%
- 6M
- 6.14%
- 1Y
- 15.46%
- 3Y*
- 13.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.43%
LUBYX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.33%
- 10Y*
- —
LABFX vs. LUBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABFX Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund | 5.39% | 12.93% | 15.10% | 11.91% | -16.16% | 4.46% | 19.37% | 19.78% | -10.25% | 8.84% |
LUBYX Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund | 1.34% | 4.99% | 5.70% | 5.16% | -0.38% | 0.07% | 1.27% | 3.00% | 2.09% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between LABFX and LUBYX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2016 | 0.09 |
The correlation between LABFX and LUBYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LABFX vs. LUBYX — Risk / Return Rank
LABFX
LUBYX
LABFX vs. LUBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX) and Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LABFX | LUBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 3.35 | -1.98 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 10.85 | -8.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.80 | 50.52 | -39.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LABFX vs. LUBYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LABFX drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than LUBYX's maximum drawdown of -2.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABFX and LUBYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LABFX | LUBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -2.59% | -38.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -0.40% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.38% | -0.50% | -9.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.26% | -1.86% | -24.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -0.10% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | -0.17% | -5.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 0.09% | +1.35% |
Volatility
LABFX vs. LUBYX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX) at 0.43%. This indicates that LABFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LABFX | LUBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 0.43% | +2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.62% | 0.96% | +5.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.03% | 1.38% | +6.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 1.37% | +9.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.41% | 1.12% | +10.29% |
LABFX vs. LUBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LABFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LUBYX's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
LABFX vs. LUBYX - Dividend Comparison
LABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than LUBYX's 4.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABFX Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund | 2.23% | 2.27% | 2.52% | 2.25% | 1.81% | 13.30% | 5.83% | 3.04% | 5.83% | 4.39% | 3.32% | 7.83% |
LUBYX Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund | 4.41% | 4.66% | 4.72% | 3.69% | 1.33% | 0.57% | 1.16% | 2.55% | 2.27% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LABFX and LUBYX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LABFX has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to LUBYX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABFX dropped -41.58% vs LUBYX's -2.59%.
LUBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LABFX and LUBYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer