LBNDX vs. JPIE
LBNDX (Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund) and JPIE (JPMorgan Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, LBNDX returned 7.17%/yr vs 6.48%/yr for JPIE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LBNDX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for JPIE.
Performance
LBNDX vs. JPIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LBNDX having a 1.63% return and JPIE slightly lower at 1.56%.
LBNDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 8.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.31%
JPIE
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 6.01%
- 3Y*
- 6.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LBNDX vs. JPIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBNDX Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund | 1.63% | 8.42% | 6.29% | 6.38% | -13.67% | -0.75% |
JPIE JPMorgan Income ETF | 1.56% | 7.39% | 6.32% | 7.07% | -6.13% | 0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between LBNDX and JPIE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021 | 0.70 |
The correlation between LBNDX and JPIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LBNDX vs. JPIE — Risk / Return Rank
LBNDX
JPIE
LBNDX vs. JPIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) and JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LBNDX | JPIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.14 | 3.81 | -1.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.28 | 6.03 | -2.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.87 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 5.27 | -2.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.39 | 26.12 | -16.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LBNDX | JPIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 3.81 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.99 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
LBNDX vs. JPIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBNDX drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, which is greater than JPIE's maximum drawdown of -9.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBNDX and JPIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBNDX | JPIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.67% | -9.96% | -16.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.08% | -1.15% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.51% | -2.40% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | 0.00% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -2.10% | -1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.23% | +0.76% |
Volatility
LBNDX vs. JPIE - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) has a higher volatility of 1.18% compared to JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE) at 0.60%. This indicates that LBNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LBNDX | JPIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | 0.60% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.17% | 1.27% | +1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.06% | 1.58% | +2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.69% | 3.53% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 3.53% | +1.51% |
LBNDX vs. JPIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LBNDX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than JPIE's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
LBNDX vs. JPIE - Dividend Comparison
LBNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, more than JPIE's 5.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPIE JPMorgan Income ETF | 5.61% | 5.65% | 6.11% | 5.70% | 4.49% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LBNDX Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund | 6.04% | 5.92% | 5.38% | 4.66% | 3.67% | 3.71% | 3.72% | 4.02% | 6.43% | 4.82% | 4.58% | 5.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LBNDX and JPIE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LBNDX has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to JPIE (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBNDX dropped -26.67% vs JPIE's -9.96%.
JPIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LBNDX and JPIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer