LBNDX vs. BRW
LBNDX (Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund) and BRW (Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, LBNDX returned 1.37%/yr vs 6.64%/yr for BRW. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LBNDX charges 0.77%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for BRW.
Performance
LBNDX vs. BRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBNDX achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than BRW's 3.52% return.
LBNDX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 6.24%
- 3Y*
- 6.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.37%
- 10Y*
- 3.93%
BRW
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 1Y
- -4.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- —
LBNDX vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBNDX Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund | 1.16% | 8.42% | 6.29% | 6.38% | -13.67% | 1.39% |
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 3.52% | 5.89% | 12.16% | 18.49% | -4.64% | 3.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between LBNDX and BRW is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LBNDX vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank
LBNDX
BRW
LBNDX vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LBNDX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.95 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | -0.26 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | -0.45 | +6.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LBNDX vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBNDX drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, which is greater than BRW's maximum drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBNDX and BRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBNDX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.67% | -17.74% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.08% | -17.74% | +13.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.51% | -17.74% | +13.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.33% | -17.74% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -8.78% | +7.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -4.05% | +0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 10.41% | -9.39% |
Volatility
LBNDX vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) is 0.97%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that LBNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LBNDX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 3.36% | -2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.25% | 8.38% | -5.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04% | 13.45% | -9.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.71% | 12.97% | -8.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 12.87% | -7.87% |
LBNDX vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
LBNDX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
LBNDX vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison
LBNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, less than BRW's 15.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 15.34% | 14.46% | 12.27% | 16.02% | 13.82% | 4.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LBNDX Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund | 6.12% | 5.92% | 5.38% | 4.66% | 3.67% | 3.71% | 3.72% | 4.02% | 6.43% | 4.82% | 4.58% | 5.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LBNDX and BRW have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRW has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to LBNDX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBNDX dropped -26.67% vs BRW's -17.74%.
LBNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LBNDX and BRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer