LBIT.TO vs. EBIT.TO
LBIT.TO (Evolve Levered Bitcoin ETF) and EBIT.TO (Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD) are both exchange-traded funds - LBIT.TO is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Evolve, while EBIT.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate. LBIT.TO is actively managed, while EBIT.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, LBIT.TO returned -53.67% vs -43.99% for EBIT.TO. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
LBIT.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBIT.TO achieves a -38.18% return, which is significantly lower than EBIT.TO's -30.50% return.
LBIT.TO
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -26.77%
- YTD
- -38.18%
- 6M
- -38.43%
- 1Y
- -53.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EBIT.TO
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -19.87%
- YTD
- -30.50%
- 6M
- -29.96%
- 1Y
- -43.99%
- 3Y*
- 26.11%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- —
LBIT.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LBIT.TO Evolve Levered Bitcoin ETF | -38.18% | 8.66% |
EBIT.TO Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD | -30.50% | -0.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between LBIT.TO and EBIT.TO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025 | 0.88 |
The correlation between LBIT.TO and EBIT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LBIT.TO vs. EBIT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LBIT.TO
EBIT.TO
LBIT.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Levered Bitcoin ETF (LBIT.TO) and Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LBIT.TO | EBIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.83 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.84 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | -1.38 | -0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LBIT.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, smaller than the maximum EBIT.TO drawdown of -75.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBIT.TO and EBIT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBIT.TO | EBIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.98% | -75.45% | +13.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.98% | -52.56% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -52.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -75.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.98% | -52.53% | -9.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.03% | -33.24% | +6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.21% | 31.84% | +6.37% |
Volatility
LBIT.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Evolve Levered Bitcoin ETF (LBIT.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.68% compared to Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) at 13.16%. This indicates that LBIT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBIT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LBIT.TO | EBIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.68% | 13.16% | +3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.22% | 34.06% | +7.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.41% | 43.50% | +8.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.66% | 53.08% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.66% | 54.69% | -3.03% |
LBIT.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LBIT.TO and EBIT.TO have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
LBIT.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither LBIT.TO nor EBIT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LBIT.TO and EBIT.TO have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LBIT.TO and EBIT.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
LBIT.TO is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while EBIT.TO is Cryptocurrency.
Find the right allocation for LBIT.TO and EBIT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer