FACVX vs. CCVIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FACVX (Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A) and CCVIX (Calamos Convertible Fund) are both Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FACVX returned 11.56%/yr vs 11.20%/yr for CCVIX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FACVX charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for CCVIX.

Performance

FACVX vs. CCVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FACVX achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly lower than CCVIX's 17.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FACVX having a 11.56% annualized return and CCVIX not far behind at 11.20%.

FACVX

• 1D: 3.00%
• 1M: -3.58%
• 6M: 8.53%
• YTD: 13.96%
• 1Y: 25.05%
• 3Y*: 13.57%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: 11.56%
• ALL TIME*: 13.20%

CCVIX

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -3.18%
• 6M: 11.31%
• YTD: 17.57%
• 1Y: 29.27%
• 3Y*: 15.47%
• 5Y*: 6.25%
• 10Y*: 11.20%
• ALL TIME*: 8.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCVIX Calamos Convertible Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FACVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FACVX vs. CCVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FACVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A	13.96%	17.95%	7.92%	11.06%	-15.59%	9.63%	42.09%	28.21%	-1.59%	8.77%
CCVIX Calamos Convertible Fund	17.57%	18.83%	9.71%	10.61%	-21.23%	5.13%	48.51%	19.18%	0.38%	14.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FACVX and CCVIX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2009	0.93

The correlation between FACVX and CCVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FACVX vs. CCVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FACVX

FACVX Risk / Return Rank: 52
FACVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FACVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FACVX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FACVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FACVX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

CCVIX

CCVIX Risk / Return Rank: 70
CCVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CCVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CCVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CCVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
CCVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FACVX vs. CCVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FACVX	CCVIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.61	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.21	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.27	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	2.69	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.85	10.12	-2.27

FACVX vs. CCVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FACVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the CCVIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FACVX and CCVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FACVX vs. CCVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FACVX drawdown since its inception was -25.09%, smaller than the maximum CCVIX drawdown of -36.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACVX and CCVIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FACVX	CCVIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.09%	-36.56%	+11.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	-10.19%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.91%	-14.80%	-4.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.32%	-27.33%	+3.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.09%	-27.33%	+2.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.02%	-7.35%	-1.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.76%	-5.88%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	2.71%	+0.26%

Volatility

FACVX vs. CCVIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX) have volatilities of 6.05% and 6.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FACVX	CCVIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.05%	6.18%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.95%	14.11%	-0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.97%	17.04%	-0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	13.41%	+0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.86%	13.12%	+0.74%

FACVX vs. CCVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FACVX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than CCVIX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FACVX vs. CCVIX - Dividend Comparison

FACVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.01%, more than CCVIX's 8.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCVIX Calamos Convertible Fund	8.61%	10.25%	1.31%	1.87%	0.60%	13.59%	6.56%	1.00%	14.47%	3.90%	2.84%	4.68%
FACVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A	9.01%	11.18%	1.85%	1.86%	3.48%	20.42%	10.56%	3.04%	9.55%	3.89%	4.62%	10.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FACVX and CCVIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FACVX and CCVIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FACVX or CCVIX?

CCVIX has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to FACVX (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FACVX dropped -25.09% vs CCVIX's -36.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.