PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBAY vs. SPUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LBAY vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBAY achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly lower than SPUS's 15.82% return.


LBAY

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
6.38%
6M
7.19%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
3.38%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*

SPUS

1D
-0.86%
1M
9.49%
YTD
15.82%
6M
15.21%
1Y
40.24%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBAY vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
6.38%4.08%-3.49%-8.54%22.41%22.27%4.58%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
15.82%19.77%26.49%34.24%-22.76%35.92%3.79%

Correlation

The correlation between LBAY and SPUS is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.17

The correlation between LBAY and SPUS shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LBAY vs. SPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LBAY
SPUS

Basic Materials

20.8%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

16.3%
2.9%

Financial Services

15.3%

-

Industrials

12.5%
7.0%

Energy

11.4%
3.3%

Utilities

11.2%
0.3%

Healthcare

5.5%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.3%
7.3%

Technology

2.8%
57.3%

Real Estate

2.8%
1.4%

Communication Services

-

6.4%

Basic Materials

LBAY
20.8%
SPUS
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

LBAY
16.3%
SPUS
2.9%

Financial Services

LBAY
15.3%
SPUS

-

Industrials

LBAY
12.5%
SPUS
7.0%

Energy

LBAY
11.4%
SPUS
3.3%

Utilities

LBAY
11.2%
SPUS
0.3%

Healthcare

LBAY
5.5%
SPUS
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

LBAY
4.3%
SPUS
7.3%

Technology

LBAY
2.8%
SPUS
57.3%

Real Estate

LBAY
2.8%
SPUS
1.4%

Communication Services

LBAY

-

SPUS
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBAY vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBAY
LBAY Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LBAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBAY Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
LBAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBAY Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBAY vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LBAYSPUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.49

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

3.79

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

16.32

-14.65

LBAY vs. SPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the SPUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBAY and SPUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LBAYSPUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

2.86

-2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.91

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.91

-0.33

Drawdowns

LBAY vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBAY drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum SPUS drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBAY and SPUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBAYSPUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.99%

-30.80%

+14.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-10.66%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.57%

-22.82%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.99%

-28.06%

+12.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.72%

-0.86%

-9.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-6.21%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.66%

2.47%

+2.19%

Volatility

LBAY vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) is 3.78%, while SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that LBAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBAYSPUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

4.00%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

10.84%

+2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

14.16%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.59%

19.23%

-5.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.73%

21.28%

-7.55%

LBAY vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBAY has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

LBAY vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison

LBAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than SPUS's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
3.80%3.80%3.77%3.47%2.74%2.96%0.29%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.52%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


LBAY and SPUS have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPUS has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to LBAY (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBAY dropped -15.99% vs SPUS's -30.80%.

On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 17.46% vs 3.82% for LBAY. On fees, SPUS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, LBAY has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 3.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for LBAY.

LBAY has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 0.52% for SPUS.

LBAY is categorized as Long-Short, while SPUS is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and SP Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for LBAY and 0.45% for SPUS.

SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBAY and SPUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer