LBAY vs. SPUS
LBAY (Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF) and SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LBAY is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Toroso Investments, while SPUS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. LBAY is actively managed, while SPUS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LBAY returned 3.82%/yr vs 17.46%/yr for SPUS. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LBAY charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SPUS.
Performance
LBAY vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBAY achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly lower than SPUS's 15.82% return.
LBAY
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- 1Y
- 7.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- —
SPUS
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- 40.24%
- 3Y*
- 24.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- —
LBAY vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBAY Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF | 6.38% | 4.08% | -3.49% | -8.54% | 22.41% | 22.27% | 4.58% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 15.82% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 34.24% | -22.76% | 35.92% | 3.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between LBAY and SPUS is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.17 |
The correlation between LBAY and SPUS shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LBAY vs. SPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LBAY
SPUS
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
LBAY
SPUS
Consumer Defensive
LBAY
SPUS
Financial Services
LBAY
SPUS
-
Industrials
LBAY
SPUS
Energy
LBAY
SPUS
Utilities
LBAY
SPUS
Healthcare
LBAY
SPUS
Consumer Cyclical
LBAY
SPUS
Technology
LBAY
SPUS
Real Estate
LBAY
SPUS
Communication Services
LBAY
-
SPUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LBAY vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank
LBAY
SPUS
LBAY vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LBAY | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.49 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 3.79 | -3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.67 | 16.32 | -14.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LBAY | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 2.86 | -2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.91 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.91 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
LBAY vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBAY drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum SPUS drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBAY and SPUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBAY | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.99% | -30.80% | +14.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -10.66% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.57% | -22.82% | +8.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.99% | -28.06% | +12.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.72% | -0.86% | -9.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.80% | -6.21% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.66% | 2.47% | +2.19% |
Volatility
LBAY vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) is 3.78%, while SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that LBAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LBAY | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 4.00% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.87% | 10.84% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.25% | 14.16% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.59% | 19.23% | -5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.73% | 21.28% | -7.55% |
LBAY vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
LBAY has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
LBAY vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison
LBAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than SPUS's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBAY Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF | 3.80% | 3.80% | 3.77% | 3.47% | 2.74% | 2.96% | 0.29% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.52% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LBAY and SPUS have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPUS has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to LBAY (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBAY dropped -15.99% vs SPUS's -30.80%.
On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 17.46% vs 3.82% for LBAY. On fees, SPUS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, LBAY has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 3.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for LBAY.
LBAY has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 0.52% for SPUS.
LBAY is categorized as Long-Short, while SPUS is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and SP Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for LBAY and 0.45% for SPUS.
SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LBAY and SPUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer